Monday, December 24, 2007

Using Sybase technology, it was able to re-architect and re-implement the application, reducing both the size and frequency of client releases.

"Ezekial 25:17 - The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequites of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he that shepherds the weak from the valley of darkness for he is truly his brother's keeper, and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers, and you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."


Case Study
Texas Workforce Commission
The Texas Workforce Commission, a state agency that oversees workforce development programs, needed to overhaul its popular client/server application to keep up with growth in size and functionality. Using Sybase technology, it was able to re-architect and re-implement the application, reducing both the size and frequency of client releases.

Reader Feedback : Page 1 of 1
Add Your Feedback
Name
Email (optional)
Web/Blog URL
Comment (WIKI format)
Help us combat spam, by answering the following; 3 + 7 =

Leave your email if you want to be notified when someone else leaves a reply. No-one will see your email and you can unsubscribe anytime.

This is a preview of your comment:

Please wait while we process your feedback




Thank you for your feedback

Click here to reload this page
#1

news desk commented on the 29 Jul 2006

The Texas Workforce Commission, a state agency that oversees workforce development programs, needed to overhaul its popular client/server application to keep up with growth in size and functionality. Using Sybase technology, it was able to re-architect and re-implement the application, reducing both the size and frequency of client releases.


Subscribe to our RSS feeds now and receive the next article instantly!
In It? Reprint It! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com to order your reprints!
YOUR FEEDBACK

PBDJ Blogger Chris Pollach Reaches 150,000 Reader Mark
By Chris Pollach
PBDJ News Desk wrote: I just wanted to acknowledge the tremendous increase in the amount of Blog activity that I have received over the past year. I think (and hope) that this is because many Sybase professionals out there have come to visit my site for latest information on ...

Sybase PowerBuilder and FTP
By Nathan E. Pralle
Declan Swayne wrote: Hi All, I am trying to incorporate this in to my Powerbuilder app. Instead of inserting the control I created a new one from it. ( due to a pb error on msvcrt.dll in PB ) I associated all properties to the ole in the open event. I then call the connect event...

XP Text Search Broken...
By Bruce Armstrong
Shaun wrote: Thank you very much!

Struts Portlets with AJAX in Action
By Kris Vishwanathan
Chrisf wrote: Hi, Can we get the source code for this article please? Thanks.

The Road Warrior's Mobile Arsenal Increases
By Ian Thain
Ian Thain wrote: Mobile Star: 10 Times Over Sybase has been named the winner of 10 Mobile Star Awards in MobileVillage's 2007 Mobile Readers Choice Awards program. The program honours the best companies, products, deployments and leaders in mobile and wireless technology. Pocke...
FEATURED WHITE PAPERS
PBDJ LATEST STORIES . . .
Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
By Coach Wei
Here is a question that I have been pondering on and off for quite a while: Why do 'cool kids' choose Ruby or PHP to build websites instead of Java? I have to admit that I do not have an answer. Why do I even care? Because I am a Java developer. Like many Java developers, I get along w
Google Developer Summit to Take Place April 21-22, 2008 in New York City
By Google Developer News Desk
In keeping with the longstanding SYS-CON tradition of being at the very forefront of software development with all its online and offline resources, SYS-CON Media & Events jointly today announced a double Google-whammy, launching both 'Google Developer's Journal' (http://googledevelope
PBDJ Blogger Chris Pollach Reaches 150,000 Reader Mark
By Chris Pollach
I just wanted to acknowledge the tremendous increase in the amount of Blog activity that I have received over the past year. I think (and hope) that this is because many Sybase professionals out there have come to visit my site for latest information on the Sybase scene. Since I starte
Where Is AJAX Headed? Discussing the Future of the Rich Web
By Jeremy Geelan
I am always being told off by i-technologists for quoting Picasso as having said that computers are useless. But I still love his reasoning: 'Because they can only give you answers.' Picasso, like AJAXWorld Magazine, liked questions. So we thought we would share with you what some of t
Third International Virtualization Conference & Expo Call for Papers Open
By Virtualization News Desk
Key opinion-formers in the field of infrastructure and pioneers of virtualization technologies of all types have already begun submitting speaking proposals to Virtualization Conference & Expo 2008 East, being held in New York City, 23-24 June, 2008. Topics covered will range from Appl
All-New AJAX Security Bootcamp at AJAXWorld 2008 East in New York
By AJAXWorld News Desk
Being held for the first time on March 18, 2008 at the historic Roosevelt Hotel in New York City, AJAXWorld Security Bootcamp is a compelling, intensive, one-day, hands-on training program that will teach Web developers, Web designers, and other Web professionals how to build secure AJ
SUBSCRIBE TO THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL NEWSLETTERS
Receive Breaking i-Technology News as it Happens...
AJAX Newsletter
Java Newsletter
Open Source/Linux Newsletter
Microsoft .NET Newsletter
Flex Newsletter
Internet Video Newsletter
iPhone Newsletter
Silverlight Newsletter

SOA/Web Services Newsletter
Virtualization Newsletter
Web 2.0 Newsletter
ColdFusion Newsletter
PowerBuilder Newsletter
XML Newsletter
Eclipse Newsletter
Google Developer Newsletter
Your E-Mail:


State:


Zip Code:





Type the characters you see in this picture (lower case):

Help Wanted: SYS-CON Media is looking for i-technology reporters, and journalists. Please apply to reporters(at)sys-con.com.
We are also seeking online advertising sales representatives with proven track record. Please apply to careers(at)sys-con.com.



SPONSOR TEXT LINKS

Saturday, July 21, 2007

Texas Workforce commission ~AKA ~WIA~

"Ezekial 25:17 - The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequites of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he that shepherds the weak from the valley of darkness for he is truly his brother's keeper, and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers, and you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."


This is the html version of the file http://www.oag.state.tx.us/opinions/ga/ga0281.pdf.
G o o g l e automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/custom?q=cache:C-fdUEA7nHoJ:www.oag.state.tx.us/opinions/ga/ga0281.pdf+Del+mar+requests&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=14&gl=us&client=google-coop-np

Google is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These terms only appear in links pointing to this page: del mar requests
Page 1
ATTORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS
GREG
ABBOTT
December 13.2004
Mr. Lowry Mays, Chair
Board of Regents
The Texas A&M University System
Post Office Box C-l
College Station, Texas 77843
Opinion No. GA-0281
Re: Whether the Texas Workforce Commission
Civil Rights Division is properly interpreting the
equal employment opportunity training requirement
of Labor Code section 21.556(a) (RQ-0240-GA)
Dear Mr. Mays:
The Texas A&M University System (“TAMU”) asks whether the Texas Workforce
Commission
Civil Rights Division (the “Commission”)
is properly interpreting
the equal
employment opportunity training requirement ofLabor Code section 21.556(a).’
I.
Backmound
Chapter 21 of the Labor Code prohibits employment discrimination in Texas. Its general
purposes include providing for the execution of federal antidiscrimination laws and identifying and
creating a state authority to enforce federal antidiscrimination policies. See
TEX. LAB. CODE ANN.
$$ 21,001(l)-(2)
(Vernon 1996). To this end, chapter 21 establishes the Texas Workforce
Commission Civil Rights Division, formerly the Texas Commission on Human Rights: as the
agency that may enforce the chapter and adopt procedural rules to carry out its purposes and policies.
See
id.
$21.003(a)(Z), (7) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05).
‘See Letter from Delmar L. Cain, General Counsel, The Texas A&M University System, to Honorable Greg
Abbon,Texas Attorney General (June 14,2004) [hereinaAerRequest Letter]; LetterattachedtoRequestLetterfromJohn
D. Moore, General Counsel, Texas Workforce Commission, to Delmar L. Cain, General Counsel, The Texas A&M
University System (June 7, 2004) [h ereinat?er Exhibit 11; Letter attached to Request Letter from Katherine A. Antwi,
General Counsel, Texas Commission on Human Rights, to W. Jan Faber, Assistant General Counsel, Tbe Texas A&M
University System (Aug. 20,2003) [hereinafter Exhibit 21 (Request Letter and Exhibits on file with Opinion Committee,
also available af http:Nuww.oag.state.tx.us).
2SeeT. LAB. CODEANN. 3 21.0015 (“The powers and duties exercised by the Commission onHummRights
under this chapter are transferred to the Texas Workforce Commission civil rights division. A reference in this chapter
to the ‘commission’ means the Texas Workforce Commission civil rights division.“); see also id 5s 301.151-,153
(Vernon Supp. 2004-05) (establishing the Civil Rights Division as an independent division in the Texas Workforce
Commission governed by the “human rights commission”).
Page 2
Mr. Lowry Mays - Page 2
(GA-0281)
Relevant to TAMU’s inquiry, chapter 21 outlines a formal process by which a person
claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful employment practice may tile a complaint with the
Commission and have that complaint reviewed to determine if there is reasonable cause to believe
that the employment practice was discriminatory. Seegenerally
id.
5s 21.201-,211 (Vernon 1996)
(subchapter E). Before the Commission will review a complaint, the complaint must meet certain
statutory requirements, which include providing the facts that establish the basis of the complaint.
See
id.
5 21.201. If the Commission determines that there is reasonable cause to believe that
discrimination has likely occurred, then the Commission will endeavor to eliminate the alleged
unlawful employment practice by informal dispute resolution methods. See
id.
5 21.207. Should
that fail, the Commission may tile a civil suit against the respondent, see
id.
3 21.25 1, or provide the
complainant with written notice of the complainant’s right to file a civil action, see
id. 5
21.252.
TAMU asks about section 21.556 of the Labor Code, which prescribes equal employment
opportunity training for state agencies that have received three or more employment discrimination
complaints within a fiscal year. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1; see also TEX. LAB. CODE
ANN. 5 21.556 (Vernon Supp. 2004-05). The Commission is charged with adopting minimum
standards for a training program and must approve a person, entity, or state agency to provide
training so long as the program complies with the Commission’s standards. See TEX. LAB. CODE
ANN. 5 21.556(d) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05). Agencies required to participate in the training program
must pay the program’s costs or reimburse the Commission or state agency that provides the training
through interagency contract, See
id.
5 21.556(e). Ifthe Commission does not conduct the training
for a state agency, that state agency must provide the Commission with documentation of the
training. See
id. 4
21.556(c).
Specifically, TAMU inquires about section 21.556(a), which establishes the circumstances
under which a state agency must receive the required equal employment opportunity training:
A state agency that receives three or more complaints of employment
discrimination
in
a fiscal year,
other than complaints determined to
be without merit,
shall provide a comprehensive equal employment
opportunity
training program to appropriate
supervisory
and
managerial employees.
Id.
5 21.556(a) (emphasis added). Chapter 21 does not define the term “merit,“nor does it establish
a process for assessing whether a complaint is “without merit.” However, a Commission rule
establishes a process for assessing a complaint’s merit for this purpose, which provides in part:
(a) The Commission will make a determination if a complaint of
employment discrimination is with or without merit by analyzing
complaints filed by employees of state agencies or applicants for
employment with state agencies, with either the Commission or the
United
States Equal Employment
Opportunity
Commission
(“EEOC”), to ascertain whether the complainant has met his or her
burden of providing sufficient factual evidence to establish the
elements of a prima facie case of employment discrimination
as
Page 3
Mr. Lowry Mays - Page 3
(GA-0281)
delineated by the United States Supreme Court (“Supreme Court”).
If a complaint is determined to have met the elements of a prima facie
case, then the complaint will be administratively processed [through]
the Commission’s
or EEOC’s investigation procedures.
If the
Commission makes a determination that a complaint has met both a
Supreme Court [prima facie] test.
and an administrative processing
test of merit, a state agency will be determined to have a complaint of
merit assessed against them.
(b) If a complainant.
fails to meet his or her burden of establishing
the elements of aprima facie case as outlined by the Supreme Court,
is prevented from filing a complaint for jurisdictional reasons, or
provides self-defeating evidence on the face of his or her complaint
that shows the complaint is defective, then the complaint will not be
administratively processed nor determined to be with merit.
29 TEX. REG. 3653 (2004) (to be codified at 40 TEX.
ADMIN. CODE
5 819,18(a)-(b)) (the “Rule”).3
TAMU informs us that it has been notified by the Commission that it must provide equal
employment opportunity training because three or more complaints of employment discrimination
were tiled against TAMU during the 2004 fiscal year. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1; see
also TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. 5 21.556(a) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05).4 TAMU contends, however,
that the Commission’s
notification is baseless because the Commission’s test for determining
merit contravenes chapter 21. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1. TAMU suggests that a
discrimination complaint triggers the section 21.556(a) trainingrequirement
onlyifthe Commission
has determined in the complaint review process outlined in chapter 21 that there is “reasonable
cause” to believe that discrimination has occurred. See
id.
at 6; see also TEX. LAB. CODE ANN.
$9 21.204-,206 (Vernon 1996). By contrast, the Commission maintains that the process for
determining a complaint’s merit for purposes of the training requirement is distinct from a finding
of reasonable cause.’ TAMU asks, essentially, which of the two interpretations is correct. See
Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1. TAMU also questions the Commission’s interpretation of the
Rule. See
id.
at 5-6.
‘In
its letter,
TAMU
refers to section 323.8 as the rule in question. Section 323.8 was renumbered as section
819.18. See 29 TEX. REG. 3653 (2004) (to be codified at 40 TEX. ADMIN. CODE $819.18). We will refer to the rule by
its most recent codification.
?AMU notes: “The letter from the commission did not identify or provide any details concerning the
complaints.” Request Letter, supra note 1, at 8. Instead, the letter only identified the complaints as having been “tiled.”
See id We were not provided with a copy of this March letter, but we assume for the purposes of this opinion that the
Commission used “filed” as shorthand to describe complaints that had been filed and deemed meritorious by the
Commissionaccording to section21,556(a) and the Rule. Neither& Commissionnor TAMU suggests that the training
requirement may be triggered merely by filing a complaint. We agree. See Tut. LAB. CODE ANN. 5 21.556 (Vernon
Supp. 2004-05); 29 TEX. REG. 3653 (2004) (to be codified at 40 TEX. ADMIN. CODE 5 819.18(a)-(b)).
‘see Brief from Don Ballard, Deputy General Counsel, Texas Workforce Commission, to Honorable Greg
Abbott, Texas Attorney General, at 4 (Aug. 2,2004) (on file with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter Commission Brief].
Page 4
Mr. Lowry Mays - Page 4
(GA-0281)
II.
Analysis
TAMU suggests that the Rule exceeds the Commission’s statutory authority. To address its
concerns, we must interpret the relevant Labor Code provisions and determine whether the Rule
comports with the Commission’s statutory authority.
In construing section 21.556 and chapter 21, we must give effect to the legislature’s intent.
See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. $5 311.021, .023 (Vernon 1998);
Albertson’s, Inc. v. Sinclair, 984
S.W.2d 958,960 (Tex. 1999). To do so, we must first attempt to construe statutes according to their
plain language, see In ye Canales, 52 S.W.3d 698, 702 (Tex. 2001), and must consider section
21.556in thecontext ofchapter 21 as awhole,see
Helena Chem. Co. v. Wilkins, 47
S.W,3d486,494
(Tex. 2001); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 5 311 .Ol l(a) (Vernon 1998) (words and phrases to
be read in context). We may also consider, among other things, a statute’s objectives, the legislative
history, the consequences of a particular construction, and its administrative construction. SeeTEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. 5 311.023 (Vernon 1998); see also
id.
5 311.021(2)-(4) (“In enacting a statute,
it is presumed that
the entire statute is intended to be effectivet,] a just and reasonable result is
intended[, and] a result feasible of execution is intended
.“).
In deciding whether the Commission, an administrative agency, has exceeded its rulemaking
powers, the determinative factor is whether the rule’s provisions are “in harmony” with the general
objectives of the statute.
See Edgewood Indep. Sch. Dist. Y. Meno,
917 S.W.2d 717, 750 (Tex.
1995). In determining whether a rule is in harmony with an act’s general objectives, courts look to
all applicable provisions of that act, rather than one particular section. See Gerst v.
Oak CLSav.
&Loan
Ass’n, 432
S.W.2d 702, 706 (Tex. 1968). Moreover, construction of a statute in the rules
of the administrative
agency charged with the statute’s enforcement “is entitled to ‘serious
consideration,’ so long as the construction is reasonable and does not contradict the plain language
of the statute.”
Tarrant Appraisal Dist.
v.
Moore, 845
S.W.2d 820, 823 (Tex. 1993) (quoting
Standford v. Butler,
181 S.W.2d 269,273 (Tex. 1944)); see also Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. GA-0233
(2004) at 4 (stating that so long as an agency’s interpretation of a statute is a reasonable one that does
not do violence to the statutory language, this office will defer to it).
A.
Whether the Rule Is Invalid for Failing to Equate Merit with Reasonable Cause
First we address TAMU’s contention that the Commission
has exceeded its
rulemaking authority under section 21.556 because the Rule does not equate the statutory phrase
“complaints determined to be without merit” with complaints for which the Commission has found
no reasonable cause. See Request Letter,
supra
note 1, at 2-3; see
also
TEX. LAB. CODE ANN.
5 21.556(a) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05).
Section 21.204 of the Labor Code requires the Commission’s
executive director, or the
director’s designee, to investigate an employment discrimination complaint filed pursuant to chapter
21 and to “determine if there is reasonable cause to believe that the respondent engaged in an
unlawful employment practice as alleged in the complaint.”
TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. 5 21.204(a)
(Vernon 1996). Though chapter 21 does not describe what form an investigation is to take, its plain
language indicates that the investigation is to go beyond the allegations stated in the complaint and
Page 5
Mr. Lowry Mays - Page 5
(GA-0281)
will consist of a review of the evidence supporting the allegations. See
id.
$5 21.205 (requiring the
executive director or fhe director’s designee on a finding that a complaint does not show reasonable
cause to issue a written determination “that
the evidence
does not support the complaint”), ,206
(requiring the executive director or the director’s designee on a finding that a complaint does show
reasonable cause to review with a panel of three commissioners
“the evidence
in the record”)
(emphasis added).
Therefore, a determination
of reasonable cause necessarily means that a
complainant has met the threshold burden of facially stating a legitimate claim and has offered some
proof to support a finding by the Commission that discrimination has likely occurred.
The Commission contends that the legislature intended to create two thresholds: when met,
the first establishes a complaint as meritorious for purposes of the training requirement, and the
second supports a finding of reasonable cause. See Commission Brief, supra note 5, at 5. The
statute’s plain language validates this position. Section 21.556(a) does not use the term “reasonable
cause”; rather,
it uses the term “merit.” See TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. $2 1.556(a) (Vernon Supp. 2004-
05) (“complaints
other than complaints determined to be without merit”). We presume that every
word in a statute is used for a purpose. See Jessen
Assocs., Inc. v. Bullock,
531 S.W.2d 593, 600
(Tex. 1975). Given the statutory language, it is reasonable for the Commission to distinguish an
assessment of “merit” from an assessment of “reasonable cause.”
The legislative history also supports the Commission’s position. Section 21.556 was adopted
in 1999 following the Sunset Commission’s review of the Texas Commission on Human Rights.
See Act ofMay 17,1999,76th Leg., R.S., ch. 872,s 15, 1999 Tex. Gen. Laws 3556,3565; HOUSE
COMM. ON STATE AFFAIRS, BILL ANALYSIS, Tex. H.B. 1976, 76th Leg., R.S. (1999) (enrolled
version, “Background and Purpose”) (“After reviewing the commission,
the Sunset Advisory
Commission had recommended its continuation and other statutory modifications.“).
According to
the Sunset Advisory Commission Staff Report, the state has an interest in preventing and resolving
discriminatory activity before it results in costly litigation. See
SUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT, TEXAS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, at 7 (October 1998). To this end, fhe
Sunset Advisory Commission advised the legislature to adopt the language of section 21.556(a),
which had formerly been contained in an appropriations rider,6 to “ensure that the Commission
continues to provide comprehensive training to familiarize all state agencies and public institutions
of higher education with [equal employment
opportunity] laws and to prevent employment
discrimination from occurring.”
Id.
at 26. Thus, section 21.556(a)‘s purpose is not to remedy
particular instances of discrimination or penalize state agencies after the fact. Rather, its purpose
is to require training of state agency personnel in order to prevent employment discrimination. When
viewed in the context of this purpose, it is reasonable to conclude that the legislature did not intend
“merit” to rise to the level of“reasonable cause.” The Commission’s construction of“without merit”
not to require a “reasonable cause” finding gives substance to and is consistent with section
21.556(a)‘s broad preventative purpose.
Finally, the Commission’s
interpretation
of “without merit” is consistent with the
legislature’s use of the phrase in another statute. Section 1071.402 of the Occupations Code
%ke Tex. Att’y Gen. op. No. DM-497 (1998) at 6 ( concluding that
an appropriations act
rider, similar to what
is now section 2 1.556, attempted to amend general law in violation of article III, section 35 of the Texas Constitution).
Page 6
Mr. Lowry Mays - Page 6
(GA-0281)
authorizes the Texas Board of Professional Land Surveying to investigate formal complaints tiled
against licensed land surveyors for alleged violations of the Professional Land Surveying Practices
Act. See
TEX.
Oct.
CODE ANN.
9 1071.402 (Vernon 2004). Section 1071.402 requires the board
to assign an employee or to contract with an investigator to investigate each alleged violation. See
id.
5 1071.402(b). The person investigating the alleged violation may dismiss a complaint that is
without merit,
or determine whether a licensed land surveyor has committed the violation and
recommend sanctions to the board. See
id.
§ 1071.402(c)(l)-(2) (emphasis added). In this instance,
the legislature has used “merit” to indicate a complaint that facially states a claim, which if proven
would constitute a violation of that act. Where the same or similar word is used “in the same
connection in different statutes,” it will be given the same meaning in one as it has in the other,
unless there is something to indicate that a different meaning was intended.
L&WSurco Mfg., Inc.
Y. Winn Tile
Co., 580 S.W.2d 920, 926 (Tex. Civ. App.-Tyler 1979, writ dism’d).
In sum, because it is consistent with the statute’s plain language, comports with the statute’s
legislative purpose, and is consistent with the legislature’s use of the phrase “without merit” in a
similar statutory context, we conclude that the Commission’s interpretation of section 21.556 to
distinguish between an assessment of“merit” and an assessment of “reasonable cause” is reasonable.
B.
Whether the Rule Misapplies the United States Supreme Court Test
TAMU also argues that the Rule fails to incorporate legal principles for resolving
discrimination complaints that are required by the United States Supreme Court. See Request Letter,
supra note 1, at 4. Specifically, TAMU argues that the Commission misapplies the
McDonnell
Douglas
test.
See id.; see also McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,
411 U.S. 792 (1973).
The
McDonnell Douglas
test outlines a burden-shifting scheme by which the parties’
evidence is evaluated. See
McDonnell Douglas,
411 U.S. at 801-03. The scheme requires the
plaintiff in an employment discrimination suit first to establish a prima facie case. See
id.
If that
burden is satisfied, the defendant then must articulate a legitimate nondiscriminatory
reason for
taking the employment action; if the defendant satisfies that burden, the plaintiff must then prove
that the defendant’s stated reason is a pretext for discrimination. See
id.
The Rule requires the Commission, in assessing whether a claim is with or without merit, “to
ascertain whether the complainant has met [the complainant’s] burden ofproviding sufficient factual
evidence
to establish the elements of aprima facie case
of employment discrimination as delineated
by the United States Supreme Court.” 29
TEX. REG.
3653 (2004) (to be codified at 40
TEX. ADMIN.
CODE
3 819.18(a)) (emphasis added). TAMU suggests that the Rule is invalid because the
Commission has selectively picked the first part of the
McDonnell Douglas
test, which the
Commission favors, while ignoring the remainder of the test. See Request Letter,
supra
note 1, at
4-5.
We have already established that the Commission has reasonably construed the term “merit”
in section 21.556(a) to be distinct from the term “reasonable cause.” The
McDonnell Douglas
test
establishes the burden of proof in the context of a trial on the merits to determine whether
discrimination has occurred.
See McDonnell Douglas,
411 US. at 801.03 (requiring the plaintiff
Page 7
Mr. Lowry Mays - Page 7
(GA-0281)
and defendant to come forward with evidence). Section 21.556(a) does not require the Commission
to use the
McDonneN Douglas
test to determine whether a complaint triggers the training
requirement, and the Rule reasonably incorporates only the test’s first part.
C.
Whether the Commission is Misinterpreting the Rule
Finally, TAMU argues that even if the Commission is authorized to adopt the Rule,
the Commission is misinterpreting it. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 5-6. In particular, TAMU
notes that the Rule also includes a second part, an “administrative processing test” of merit, which
the Rule fails to define. See
id.
at 5. The Rule’s section 819.18(a) reads in relevant part:
If a complaint is determined to have met the elements of a prima facie
case, then the complaint will be
administrativelyprocessed [through]
the Commission’s
or EEOC’s
investigation procedures.
If the
Commission makes a determination that a complaint has met both a
Supreme Court [prima facie] test
.
and an
administrative
processing test ofmerit,
a state agency will be determined to have a
complaint of merit assessed against them.
29
TEX.
REG. 3653 (2004) (to be codified at 40
TEX. ADMIN. CODE
§ 819.18(a)) (emphasis added).
In a letter to TAMU, Commission staff clarified this part ofthe Rule by stating that it addresses the
Commission’s jurisdiction over a complaint. See Request Letter,
supra
note 1, at 5; Exhibit 2,
supra
note 1. That is, if the complaint falls within the Commission’s jurisdiction, then the complaint
passes the administrative processing test of merit. See Request Letter,
supra
note 1, at 5-6; Exhibit
2,
supra
note 1. TAMU counters that this explanation is inconsistent with the Rule. See Request
Letter,
supra
note 1, at 6. Instead, TAMU asserts that this language in the Rule should tie the
“administrative processing” test of merit to formal investigation procedures outlined in chapter 21
of the Labor Code. See
id, see also
TEX. LAB. CODE ANN.
5 21.204(a) (Vernon 1996) (directing the
Commission to investigate an employment discrimination complaint for reasonable cause). Thus,
TAMU argues that the Rule itself necessarily requires a finding of reasonable cause before a
complaint can be counted as meritorious. See Request Letter,
supra
note 1, at 6.
We construe administrative rules in the same way as statutes, and an agency’s interpretation
of its own rule is entitled to deference. See
Pub. Util. Comm ‘n v. GulfStates Utils. Co., 809
S.W.2d
201,207 (Tex. 1991). However, ifan agency fails to follow the clear, unambiguous language ofits
own regulation, it exceeds its authority. See
id.
Here, we question the Commission’s assertion that the administrative processing test ofmcrit
is nothing more than a finding that the Commission has jurisdiction over a complaint. See Request
Letter,
supra
note I, at 5-6; Exhibit 2, supra note I.’ The Rule’s subsection @) reads:
‘We rely on the Commission’s letter attached to the TAMU request letter as Exhibit 2. See Exhibit 2, supra
note 1. The Commission did not address the meaning of “administrative processing test of merit” in its brief to this
office. See Commission Brief, supra note 5.
Page 8
Mr. Lowry Mays - Page 8
(GA-0281)
If a complainant.
fails to meet his or her burden of establishing the
elements of a prima facie case as outlined by the Supreme Court, is
prevented from filing a complaint for jurisdictional reasons,
or
provides self-defeating evidence on the face of his or her complaint
that shows the complaint is defective,
then the complaint will not be
administratively processed
nor determined to be with merit.
29
TEX.
REG. 3653 (2004) (to be codified at 40
TEX. ADMIN. CODE
5 819.18(b) (emphasis added)).
By its plain language, subsection (b) suggests that when the Commission lacks jurisdiction over a
complaint, the complaint will not be administratively processed. Because subsection (b) suggests
that establishing jurisdiction is a prerequisite to a complaint being administratively processed, the
Rule’s language does not appear to support the Commission’s construction that administrative
processing is merely a determination ofjurisdiction.
Nevertheless, we disagree that this part of the
Rule necessarily requires a finding of reasonable cause before an employment discrimination
complaint can be counted as meritorious. Nothing in the Rule supports the construction that meeting
the “administrative processing test of merit” is equivalent to a reasonable cause finding.
In sum, the Commission does not appear to have given a meaning to the “administrative
processing test of merit” that is consistent with the Rule as a whole. However, we cannot agree with
TAMU that this part of the Rule limits the Commission to counting only those complaints for which
it has found reasonable cause in determining that an agency must provide equal employment
opportunity training under section 21.556(a).
Page 9
Mr. Lowry Mays - Page 9
(GA-0281)
SUMMARY
Section 21.556(a) of the Labor Code requires a state agency
to provide equal employment
opportunity training after three
employment discrimination complaints have been filed against the
agency other than complaints determined to be without merit.
Section 21.556 does not require that the Texas Workforce
Commission
Civil Rights Division find reasonable cause that
discrimination
has likely occurred in order to determine that a
complaint counts toward the training requirement.
The Texas
Workforce Commission Civil Rights Division rule establishing a
procedure to determine whether a complaint is without merit
reasonably construes section 21.556(a). However, the Commission’s
interpretation of the rule must be consistent with the rule’s plain
language.
Very truly yours,
BARRY R. MCBEE
First Assistant Attorney General
DON R. WILLETT
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
NANCY S. FULLER
Chair, Opinion Committee
Daniel C. Bradford
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Equal Opportunity Employer ~legalization ~ 2.modify your JOB opportunities

"Ezekial 25:17 - The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequites of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he that shepherds the weak from the valley of darkness for he is truly his brother's keeper, and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers, and you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."

Page 1
TexasWorkforcePress Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Larry Jones
DATE: September 13, 2006
PHONE: (512) 463-8556
Texas Workforce Commission Executive Director
Elected President-Elect of National Workforce Association
AUSTIN – Larry Temple, Executive Director of the Texas Workforce Commission, was elected President-
elect of the National Association of State Workforce Agencies (NASWA), September 8, 2006 at the
association’s annual Board of Director’s meeting in Boise, Idaho. NASWA is a national organization of state
directors of workforce services whose mission is to coordinate local, state, and federal roles in workforce
development. Mr. Temple has been a member of the NASWA Board of Director’s since 2003 where he also
served as Chair of the Administration and Finance Committee and Co-chair of the Communications
Committee.
Larry is the Executive Director of the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC), a state agency with an operating
budget of approximately $1.2 billion in addition to the issuance of $2 billion in unemployment insurance
benefits annually. TWC has oversight of the state’s employment, training, welfare reform, childcare, and
unemployment insurance programs and delivers these services to its 254 counties through a network of 28
local workforce development boards.
Temple began his public-sector career in 1992, when he was named deputy director of the Mississippi
Department of Human Services. His successes in Mississippi led him to Texas in 1997, where he was named
director of TWC’s Office of Welfare Reform and later deputy executive director.
He serves as a member of the State’s P-16 Council, which coordinates educational policy between Pre-k and
12 public education and higher education. He also serves on the Texas Workforce Investment Council, whose
charge is to develop strategic planning and evaluation that promotes a well educated and highly skilled
workforce.
Temple brings to the job over 20 years of private-sector management experience in energy, retail and real
estate development. Temple holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in History from St. Edwards University where he
serves as a member of the Advisory Council.
“I am humbled and honored to be selected President-elect of this fine organization, particularly as this is a vote
by my colleagues around the nation,” said Larry Temple. “Texas has long been recognized as a national leader
in workforce development, through high performance cash bonuses and other awards. I have given my pledge
to the board members from the other states that I will do my best to live up to those same standards while
serving them as President-elect of NASWA.”
The Texas Workforce Commission is a state agency dedicated to helping Texas employers, workers and communities prosper
economically. For details on TWC and the programs it offers in unison with its network of local workforce development boards, call
(512) 463-8556 or visit www.texasworkforce.org.
###lmj
Texas Workforce Commission • 512-463-8942 • http://www.texasworkforce.org • Equal Opportunity Employer
Relay Texas • 1-800-735-2989 (TDD) • 1-800-735-2988 (Voice)

Sunday, May 27, 2007

Texas Public Education Watchdog Authority: Dear Chuy Hinojosa, Florence Shapiro and distinguished Education Committee Members

Texas Public Education Watchdog Authority: Dear Chuy Hinojosa, Florence Shapiro and distinguished Education Committee Members


Just give us (Education) the Lottery Proceeds as per original bill of sale. The Lottery was sold to us (the voters of the great State of Texas) as 100% of the proceeds were for Educating our youth.

What percentage of the Lottery proceeds (currently) are dedicated to the education of our youth?

Why is it, the wealth always steals from our children after acting like they were creating, “doing it for th kids” huge reservoirs of Avarice to siphon off.

Like the Lottery originally was ratified by the people of the Great State of Texas with the belief ot was a moneymaker for our Children’s Education. And now how much of the Lottery revenue makes it to Public Education?



Perry Craddick & Corporate Welfare in the name of WIA, ED Byrne Grant, and under the guise of helping the poor.


With the Education funding we should demand that the dedication of lottery money to the Education of our Children be adhered to as it was sold to Texas. The Lottery when legislated was for the Education of Texas Students. Finally, the Private Sector is funded under the WIA slush fund for Corporate Welfare Recipients under the Guise of a Welfare Reform or Welfare to Work / JOB generating program to help the poor. The rich are getting richer in the name of helping the poor. And one needs to always remember it is both parties dippin into the creative crony contractualism. Give it a title, write a grant and set up a front office with a computer and a sign; then get some brochures and a few token clients and funnel the Avarice in a shell game like manner and voila a new ranch or a new house maybe an agency hummer or King Ranch Pickup Truck with a magnetic sign. Give a few JOBS to your network affiliates and send the clients to perform community based work and get rich and richer doing it. Ask Mary Cano or Oscar Martinez to explain it in detail. Charmed I'm sure.



TFT LEGISLATIVE HOTLINE--FRIDAY, MAY 25, 2007
>(copyright 2007 Texas Federation of Teachers)
>
>Proposed State Budget Shortchanges Schools and Educators; Keep Up the Fight
>For House TRS Plan; House at a Standstill as Speaker Clings to Power
>
>Proposed Budget Shortchanges Public Schools, Education Employees: TFT
>President Linda Bridges put out a press statement today deploring the
>results of the House-Senate conference committee on the 2008-2009 budget.
>The state budget plan in House Bill 1 still must win the approval of
>majorities in both the House and Senate. As President Bridges' statement
>below explains, HB 1 in its current form does not deserve that approval:
>
>"Education and educators would be shortchanged badly in the budget proposed
>by House-Senate conferees this afternoon. Based on the information
>currently
>available, school funding would remain static, not even getting back to the
>level of state and local funding school districts had in 2002 in real
>terms, after you take inflation into account. The $850-a-year
>cost-of-living pay raise for teachers passed by the House last month would
>shrivel to about $425, according to the legislative budget staff. If paid
>out to all teachers across the board, this would amount to less than $25 a
>month after taxes and deductions--not even enough to cover the cost of
>rising average health-care premiums. And the conferees took pains today to
>say the money would not even have to be paid out across the board to all
>teachers.
>
>"Worst of all is what this budget proposal would do regarding TRS pension
>benefits. The bill would withhold an eminently affordable and exceedingly
>modest pension boost--a 13th check for TRS retirees--unless other
>legislation passes
>to impose new levies on all current school employees. The only way retirees
>would get a 13th check, under this scheme devised by Sen. Robert Duncan,
>would be if active school employees pay a higher contribution rate, taking
>roughly $50 million a year out of their pockets. This plan totally
>contradicts the House legislation passed unanimously on Wednesday that
>would provide a 13th check for retirees fully funded by the state, without
>imposing any new levies on active employees.
>
>"In short, school districts under this budget would regain none of the
>ground they have lost financially, teachers would get at best a measly pay
>raise of less than $25 a month that wouldn't even keep up with inflation,
>and 300,000 school support personnel would suffer an actual pay cut, as a
>result of the higher levies imposed on them for TRS with no compensating
>increase in pay. You have to give the
>conferees credit--it takes a certain ingenuity to come up with a plan this
>bad at a time when the state is sitting on a record-high budget surplus."
>
>Keep Up the Fight for House TRS Plan! At this writing members of the Texas
>House are standing firm in support of their unanimously approved plan for a
>13th check for TRS retirees, funded by an increase in the state
>contribution rate to 6.7 percent, with no new costs imposed on active
>school employees. Several Senate offices reported to us today that they are
>receiving a high volume of calls in support of this House version of SB
>1846--as well they should be. The Senate alternative proposed by Sen.
>Robert Duncan, Republican of Lubbock, is a thinly veiled attempt to shift
>state costs for TRS pensions onto active employees and their school
>districts.
>
>Duncan let slip the real agenda during floor debate on his plan,
>noting that increasing the TRS levy on active employees and requiring a
>contribution from school districts could "free up general revenue for other
>purposes." In other words, this scheme would allow the state to save money
>by shifting costs onto education employees and local taxpayers.
>
>Duncan's staff in response to callers today reportedly was claiming that
>the freshly hatched budget deal (see above) means that there's no money and
>no time left to provide this session for the 6.7-percent state contribution
>rate that the House proposes. But that's not so. The legislature has
>billions of dollars left to allocate right now, and it would take only a
>tiny fraction of that treasure--less than 1 percent of it, in fact--for the
>state to get to the 6.7-percent TRS contribution rate from the 6.58 percent
>already built into the budget. Even if the budget bill passes in its
>current form, the
>House plan for a fully state-paid 13th check with no new costs imposed on
>active employees could also still pass and become law with full force and
>effect, delivering a 13th check in September.
>
>The upshot is that you have an opportunity right now to shape the outcome
>of this TRS benefit fight in the critical remaining days before adjournment
>of the legislative session on Monday. Just send the letter on this issue to
>your state senator from the TFT Web site. If you don't know your state
>senator, you can find out quickly when you go to that Web letter.
>
>Speaker's Grip on Gavel Threatened: The Texas House came to a standstill at
>8 PM this evening, as Speaker of the House Tom Craddick shut off House
>members' microphones and called a three-hour recess to head off a
>rank-and-file revolt
>threatening to oust him from the speaker's chair. The Midland Republican is
>under heavy fire from both fellow Republicans and Democrats for what many
>consider his tyrannical rule of the House. Tonight he gave them new grist
>for their argument, by ruling that there is no appeal to the membership as
>a whole if he blocks the parliamentary procedure needed to oust him. His
>ruling, epitomizing the arbitrary, one-man rule of which Speaker Craddick
>stands accused, apparently has led to the resignation of the House
>parliamentarian in protest this evening. Like everyone else at the capitol,
>we are now waiting to see if the House will actually reconvene tonight.
>Keep an eye out for news of the latest developments in the daily TFT
>hotlines that will be published each of the next three days as the
>legislative session hurtles toward final adjournment.


Senate Committee on Education
Committee Information
Chair Vice-Chair Members:

Thursday, May 24, 2007

"IN THE KNOW": dont ever forget who put you on the map.

"IN THE KNOW": dont ever forget who put you on the map.


Dear Rev. Jones,

Tuesday Morning on El Defenzor Live you posed a question (In our eyes) did the past city council do anything positive?

The answer is simple

It takes many good deeds to build a reputation, and only one bad one to lose it. - Ben Frankiln.

Leadership or associates that have been shown to have lied, deliberately misled or fabricated information or have hidden their beliefs or behaviors to gain an audience, money, friendship, even upon a declared repentance, could never be fully trusted again in many people's minds. Not because they cannot be forgiven, but because, by their very own deceptive words they have deliberately misled people for gain in some way, while being in a place of influence or control and trust in another person's life. The lies have fully broken their trustworthiness, and saying they can now be trusted is not the same as being able to trust them. True Biblical repentance would likely have those in leadership remove themselves from any position of authority, because of the very necessary Biblical qualifications for being placed in leadership in the first place. Leadership must prove they are indeed trustworthy, honest and sound in the faith, which would of necessity take more than a little time to prove, especially for those who have betrayed trust through lies and deception.
Be fair, lose that big head (humble yourself) and let Homer speak. You have 4 other days to talk, talk, talk and now people actually listen but dont ever forget who put you on the map.

Your's Truly,

J. Kenedeno

Monday, April 16, 2007

Program expansion is a natural result of the need to support CCisd or are youin need a feasibility study could immediately begin to assess.....illeg

"Ezekial 25:17 - The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequites of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he that shepherds the weak from the valley of darkness for he is truly his brother's keeper, and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers, and you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."

PRINT THIS STORY | E-MAIL THIS STORY

City, Port officials back lawmakers proposing A&M-CC engineering school

By Israel Saenz/Caller-Times
April 16, 2007

City and Port of Corpus Christi officials on Monday met with state legislators in support of an engineering school at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi.

Officials who traveled to Austin, including Port Chairman Ruben Bonilla, Mayor Henry Garrett and Port Vice-Chairman Bernard Paulson, discussed two bills which would allow the Texas A&M University System Board of Regents to establish such a school at the university.

;
The bill was filed by March 5 Sen. Juan "Chuy" Hinojosa, D-McAllen. Area representatives Juan Garcia, Solomon P. Ortiz Jr. and Abel Herrero filed a similar bill March 9 in the House.

"We testified that A&M-Corpus Christi is a growing regional university, and has an expanding curriculum," Bonilla said. "It has a developing relationship with the Port of Corpus Christi and port industries, as well as the rest of the Coastal Bend. An engineering school at A&M-Corpus Christi would provide a steady pool of qualified engineers."

A&M — Corpus Christi President Flavius Killebrew did not take part in the trip, but released a statement Monday voicing support for the bills.

"Program expansion is a natural result of the need to support the curricular interests of an expanded student body," the statement read. "The university has long sought to serve the needs of the community and will continue to do so. We appreciate the senator’s support of the university and it’s growth."

Garcia said if the bill passes, a feasibility study could immediately begin to assess the cost of the program to the state as well as its economic impact.

Contact Israel Saenz at 886-3767 or saenzi@caller.com

Friday, March 09, 2007

Watt is the hold up Mary Cano......

"Ezekial 25:17 - The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequites of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he that shepherds the weak from the valley of darkness for he is truly his brother's keeper, and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers, and you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."

Where is your affidavit "Ms. Haley~anything i say is only going to go AGAINST you"


bring it biotch~ as sonic the hedgehog says:~"I'm waiting"

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Substitute Teaching Does Not Qualify as Employment per Texas Workforce Commission

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

TEXAS UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW

TEXAS UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LAW
A. Sources of Law, Organization, and Websites
The Texas Unemployment Compensation Act is found at TEX. LABOR CODE ANN.
CHAPTER 201.
The “Texas Workforce Commission” (referred to herein as “TWC”) is the state agency
that administers the act pursuant to TEX. LABOR CODE ANN. CHAPTER 301. Prior to 1995,
the agency that administered the act was called the “Texas Employment Commission,” and the
older case law will refer to it (or TEC) rather than the Texas Workforce Commission or TWC.
Pursuant to TEX. LABOR CODE ANN. §§301.061 and 302.002, the TWC has enacted rules and
regulations, and the rules and regulations for unemployment insurance may be found at 40 TEX.
ADMIN. CODE Chapter 815. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE.
TWC
has a detailed website at http://www.twc.state.tx.us. You will need to make sure
that you have Adobe Acrobat Reader to access many of the items in the website. When you
open the website, it will have a map of Texas surrounded by boxes with various headings that are
interactive links to the website. Click on the heading that says “JOB SEEKERS AND
EMPLOYEES”. When you click on this heading, it will take you to a table of contents and the
topics are also interactive links to the site. Click on the heading that says “Unemployment Claim
and Appeals Information,” and it will take you to the table of contents for “Unemployment
Claim and Appeals Information,” which is located at the following address:
http://www.twc.state.tx.us/customers/jsemp/jsempsub2.html. Another helpful part of the website
is the table entitled “Laws: Statutes and Rules” located at
http://www.twc.state.tx.us/customers/rpm/rpmsub1.html and the headings are interactive links to
the laws and rules.
The website includes a complete copy of the above mentioned rules, and the index to the
rules may be found in a table located at http://www.twc.state.tx.us/twcinfo/rules/twcrules.html.
The unemployment compensation rules are found in Chapter 815 in the table and may be
accessed in either PDF (requires Adobe Acrobat to read) or Word 97 format. In addition to the
rules, the TWC Appeals Manual, which describes the appeals process and states the procedures
for the handling of appeals, may be found at http://www.twc.state.tx.us/ui/appl/app_man1.html.
The TWC Appeals Policy and Precedent Manual, which contains digest paragraphs of case
holdings made or approved by the Commission and designated by the Commission to stand as
precedent, is available online also at http://www.twc.state.tx.us/ui/appl/app_manual.html.

207.041. SERVICES IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS: "reasonable assurance that the individual will perform services

 § 207.041. SERVICES IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS.  (a)
Benefits are not payable to an individual based on services
performed in an instructional, research, or principal
administrative capacity for an educational institution for a week
beginning during the period between two successive academic years
or terms or under an agreement providing for a similar period
between two regular but not successive terms if:
(1) the individual performed the services in the first
of the academic years or terms; and
(2) there is a contract or reasonable assurance that
the individual will perform services in that capacity for any
educational institution in the second of the academic years or
terms.
(b) Benefits are not payable to an individual based on
services performed for an educational institution in a capacity
other than a capacity described by Subsection (a) for a week that
begins during a period between two successive academic years or
terms if:
(1) the individual performed the services in the first
of the academic years or terms; and
(2) there is a reasonable assurance that the
individual will perform the services in the second of the academic
years or terms.
(c) Notwithstanding Subsection (b), if benefits are denied
to an individual for any week under Subsection (b) and the
individual is not offered an opportunity to perform services for
the educational institution for the second of the academic years or
terms, the individual is entitled to a retroactive payment of the
benefits for each week that:
(1) the individual filed a timely claim for benefits;
and
(2) the benefits were denied solely because of
Subsection (b).
(d) Benefits are not payable to an individual based on
services performed for an educational institution for a week that
begins during an established and customary vacation period or
holiday recess if:
(1) the individual performed the services in the
period immediately before the vacation period or holiday recess;
and
(2) there is a reasonable assurance that the
individual will perform the services in the period immediately
following the vacation period or holiday recess.
(e) Benefits are not payable as provided under this section
to an individual based on services performed in an educational
institution if the individual performed the services while employed
by an educational service agency. For the purposes of this
subsection, "educational service agency" means a governmental
agency or other governmental entity that is established and
operated exclusively to provide services to one or more educational
institutions.

Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993.

TPU 105.00: Substitute teachers may have reasonable


7. The following is current Commission policy, Appeal No. 82-4799-10-0782 (TPU 105.00), with regard to substitute teachers:

8. The following are some factors the Hearing Officer should keep in mind when deciding whether or not a substitute teacher had reasonable assurance of being called the next year or term:

    1. The Hearing Officer should find out how long the claimant has been on a substitute teacher list for this employer and how many times they have been called.

    2. The Hearing Officer should also determine the total number of people on the past substitute list and the probable number of people on the next year's list.

    3. The method the employer uses in determining what people will be called from the substitute list should be explored.



APPEALS POLICY AND PRECEDENT MANUAL

TOTAL AND PARTIAL UNEMPLOYMENT

TPU 105.00

TPU 105.00 CONTRACT OBLIGATION.
INCLUDES CASES IN WHICH THE CLAIMANT'S CONTRACTS
OR AGREEMENTS HAVE AN EFFECT ON DETERMINING HIS
UNEMPLOYMENT STATUS.

Appeal No. 82-4799-10-0782. Substitute teachers may have reasonable

assurance of continued employment within the meaning of
Section 3(f) (now codified as Section 207.041) of the Act. In determining
whether such reasonable assurance exists with regard to
substitute teachers, the following criteria should be utilized:
The school district must furnish to the Commission
written statements which provide facts that the substitute
teacher has been asked to continue in the
same capacity for the following academic year. Simply
placing the substitute teacher on a list for the following
year does not establish reasonable assurance.
It must be shown that both parties expect the relationship
to resume at the beginning of the following
year. The assurance must also be based on past experience
with regard to the number of substitutes
needed in the past.

Sunday, December 24, 2006

§ 2308.265. INCENTIVES AND WAIVERS. (A board.....certified by the governor?

"Ezekial 25:17 - The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequites of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he that shepherds the weak from the valley of darkness for he is truly his brother's keeper, and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers, and you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."



GOVERNMENT CODE

CHAPTER 2308. WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS


§ 2308.001. SHORT TITLE. This chapter may be cited as the
Workforce Investment Act.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 1.02, eff.
Sept. 1, 2003.


§ 2308.002. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(1) "Council" means the Texas Workforce Investment
Council.
(2) "Division" means the division of workforce
development of the Texas Workforce Commission.
(3) "Local labor market" means an economically
integrated geographical area within which individuals may reside
and find employment within a reasonable distance.
(4) "Workforce development" includes workforce
education and workforce training and services.
(5) "Workforce education" means articulated
career-path programs and the constituent courses of those programs
that lead to initial or continuing licensing or certification or
associate degree-level accreditation and that:
(A) are subject to:
(i) initial and ongoing state approval or
regional or specialized accreditation;
(ii) a formal state evaluation that
provides the basis for program continuation or termination;
(iii) state accountability and performance
standards; and
(iv) a regional or statewide documentation
of the market demand for labor according to employers' needs; or
(B) are subject to approval by the Texas Higher
Education Coordinating Board as adult vocational or continuing
education courses.
(6) "Workforce training and services" means training
and services programs that are not workforce education.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.01(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 1.03, eff. Sept.
1, 2003.


§ 2308.003. CONTRACTING FOR PRIVATE SERVICES NOT
RESTRICTED. This chapter does not restrict a person's authority to
contract for the provision of workforce development without state
or federal funds.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.004. PROGRAM YEAR. Under this chapter, a program
year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30 unless otherwise specified
under appropriate state or federal law.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 1, eff. Sept.
1, 1999.


§ 2308.005. APPLICATION OF SUNSET ACT. The Texas
Workforce Investment Council is subject to Chapter 325 (Texas
Sunset Act). Unless continued in existence as provided by that
chapter, the council is abolished September 1, 2015.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.02(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1169, § 2.06, eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 1.04, eff. Sept.
1, 2003.


§ 2308.006. APPLICATION OF PRIOR LAW. (a) If a change in
law made by House Bill 3431, Acts of the 76th Legislature, Regular
Session, 1999, would have the effect of invalidating an exemption
granted under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (Pub. L. No.
105-220), the Texas Workforce Investment Council may not operate
under that change in law but, instead, shall operate under the law
as it existed before September 1, 1999.
(b) A change in law described by Subsection (a) of this
section does not affect other related provisions or applications of
a statute that can be given effect without that change in law, and
to this end those other provisions and applications of the statute
shall be given effect.

Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.
Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 1.05, eff. Sept. 1,
2003.

SUBCHAPTER B. COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION


§ 2308.051. COUNCIL. (a) The council acts as a state
human resource investment council under the Job Training Reform
Amendments of 1992 (29 U.S.C. Section 1792 et seq.) and as a state
workforce investment board under the Workforce Investment Act of
1998 (Pub. L. No. 105-220).
(b) The council is attached for administrative purposes to
the office of the governor.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.03(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 3, eff. Sept. 1,
1999.


§ 2308.052. MEMBERSHIP. (a) The governor shall appoint
the members of the council as provided by this section.
(b) The council is composed of:
(1) three voting members who represent education, one
of whom represents local public education, one of whom represents
public postsecondary education, and one of whom represents
vocational education;
(2) five voting members who represent organized labor
appointed from recommendations made by recognized labor
organizations;
(3) five voting members who represent business and
industry, including business members serving on local workforce
development boards or private industry councils;
(4) one voting member who represents community-based
organizations; and
(5) the following ex officio voting members:
(A) the commissioner of education;
(B) the commissioner of higher education;
(C) the commissioner of human services;
(D) the executive director of the Texas
Department of Economic Development; and
(E) the executive director of the Texas Workforce
Commission.
(c) The membership of the council must represent the
geographic diversity of this state.
(d) A member of the council who represents a community-based
organization may not be a provider of services.
(e) Appointments to the council shall be made without regard
to the race, color, disability, sex, religion, age, or national
origin of the appointees.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.04(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 4, eff. Sept. 1,
1999; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 2.01, eff. Sept. 1, 2003;
Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1170, § 48.01, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


§ 2308.053. PRESIDING OFFICER. (a) The governor shall
designate one of the business or labor representatives on the
council as the presiding officer of the council to serve in that
capacity at the pleasure of the governor.
(b) The presiding officer of the council shall designate a
member of the council as assistant presiding officer to preside in
the absence of the presiding officer.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 2.02, eff.
Sept. 1, 2003.


§ 2308.054. TERMS. (a) A member of the council who does
not serve as an ex officio member serves a six-year term.
Approximately one-third of these members' terms expire in each
odd-numbered year.
(b) An ex officio member serves as a member of the council as
long as the member continues to serve in the designated office.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 2.03, eff.
Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1170, § 48.02, eff.
Sept. 1, 2003.


§ 2308.055. DESIGNATED REPLACEMENTS. (a) A member of the
council may designate another person to attend a meeting for the
member.
(b) The designated person may participate in the activities
and discussions of the council but may not vote.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.056. GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL. (a) It is a ground for
removal from the council that a member who is not an ex officio
member:
(1) does not have at the time of appointment the
qualifications required by Section 2308.052;
(2) does not maintain during service on the council
the qualifications required by Section 2308.052;
(3) cannot, because of illness or disability,
discharge the member's duties for a substantial part of the member's
term;
(4) is absent from more than one-fourth of the
regularly scheduled council meetings that the member is eligible to
attend during a calendar year without an excuse approved by a
majority vote of the council's members; or
(5) is absent from two consecutive council meetings
for which the member received notice not less than 48 hours before
the time of the meeting.
(b) The validity of an action of the council is not affected
by the fact that it is taken when a ground for removal of a council
member exists.
(c) If the executive director has knowledge that a potential
ground for removal exists, the executive director shall notify the
presiding officer of the council of the ground. The presiding
officer shall then notify the governor and the attorney general
that a potential ground for removal exists. If the potential ground
for removal involves the presiding officer, the executive director
shall notify the next highest ranking officer of the council, who
shall then notify the governor and the attorney general that a
potential ground for removal exists.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 2.04, eff.
Sept. 1, 2003.


§ 2308.057. MEETINGS. The council shall meet at least
quarterly and at other times at the call of the presiding officer or
as provided by rules adopted by the council.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.058. SUBCOMMITTEES; TECHNICAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEES. (a) The presiding officer of the council may appoint
subcommittees consisting of members of the council for any purpose
consistent with the duties and responsibilities of the council
under this chapter.
(b) The presiding officer of the council may appoint
technical advisory committees composed of council members, persons
who are not council members, or both members and nonmembers.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.059. FISCAL AGENT. The office of the governor
shall serve as the council's fiscal agent.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.05, eff.
Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.060. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. (a) The presiding
officer of the council shall appoint an executive director of the
council.
(b) The executive director shall:
(1) report to the presiding officer of the council;
(2) perform duties assigned by the council and under
state law;
(3) administer the daily operations of the council;
(4) appoint officers, accountants, attorneys,
experts, and other employees for the council and assign duties for
these employees to perform the council's powers and duties under
this chapter; and
(5) delegate authority to persons appointed under this
section as the executive director considers to be reasonable and
proper for the effective administration of the council.
(c) The executive director shall adopt the administrative
and personnel procedures of the council's fiscal agent.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.06(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.061. STAFF. (a) The council shall have an
independent staff with expertise sufficient to perform all duties
and responsibilities of the council.
(b) The staff may be supplemented by staff from other state
agencies who are temporarily assigned to assist with special
projects.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.065. FUNDING. (a) Federal funding for the
operation of the council shall be allocated according to federal
requirements.
(b) A state agency represented on the council shall provide
funds for the support of the council in proportion to the agency's
financial participation in the workforce development system. The
council, with the governor's approval, shall establish a funding
formula to determine the level of support each agency must provide.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 704, § 1, eff. Sept.
1, 2001.

SUBCHAPTER C. COUNCIL DUTIES AND POWERS


§ 2308.101. GENERAL DUTIES. (a) The council shall:
(1) promote the development of a well-educated, highly
skilled workforce in this state;
(2) advocate the development of an integrated
workforce development system to provide quality services
addressing the needs of business and workers in this state;
(3) recommend to the governor the designation or
redesignation of workforce development areas for the local planning
and delivery of workforce development;
(4) identify and recommend to the governor incentives
to encourage the consolidation, on a regional labor market basis,
of:
(A) local boards, councils, and committees; and
(B) service delivery areas authorized under
federal workforce legislation;
(5) review plans for local workforce development and
make recommendations to the governor for approval;
(6) evaluate the effectiveness of the workforce
development system;
(7) use the administrative records of the state's
unemployment compensation program and other sources as appropriate
in evaluating the workforce development system;
(8) encourage, support, or develop research and
demonstration projects designed to develop new programs and
approaches to service delivery;
(9) recommend measures to ensure that occupational
skills training is:
(A) provided in occupations that are locally in
demand; and
(B) directed toward high-skill and high-wage
jobs;
(10) monitor the operation of the state's workforce
development system to assess the degree to which the system is
effective in achieving state and local goals and objectives;
(11) develop and recommend to the governor criteria
for the establishment of local workforce development boards;
(12) carry out the federal and state duties and
responsibilities of advisory councils under applicable federal and
state workforce development laws or regulations;
(13) report periodically to the governor and the
legislature; and
(14) provide annual reports to the governor and the
legislature, including an annual report analyzing work development
programs that focus on welfare to work initiatives.
(b) The council shall provide the information required to be
reported under Subsections (a)(13) and (14) and Section 2308.104(a)
to the Texas Workforce Commission. The Texas Workforce Commission
shall include information provided under this subsection that
relates to the administration and operation of the state's
workforce development system with other information the commission
provides to the public on the Internet.
(c) The members of the council shall develop and implement
policies that:
(1) clearly separate:
(A) the policy-making responsibilities of the
members of the council; and
(B) the management responsibilities of the
executive director and the staff of the council; and
(2) provide the public with a reasonable opportunity
to appear before the council and to speak on any issue under the
jurisdiction of the council.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.07(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 5, eff. Sept. 1,
1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 704, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2001;
Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 3.01, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


§ 2308.1015. DUTY TO FACILITATE DELIVERY OF INTEGRATED
WORKFORCE SERVICES. (a) To facilitate the seamless delivery of
integrated workforce services in this state, the council shall:
(1) evaluate programs administered by agencies
represented on the council to identify:
(A) any duplication of or gaps in the services
provided by those programs; and
(B) any other problems that adversely affect the
seamless delivery of those services; and
(2) develop and implement immediate and long-range
strategies to address problems identified by the council under
Subdivision (1).
(b) The council shall include in the council's annual report
to the governor and to the legislature:
(1) a list of specific problems identified by the
council under Subsection (a) to be addressed by the council in the
following year; and
(2) the results of any measures taken by the council to
address problems identified by the council under Subsection (a).
(c) The long-range strategies developed by the council
under Subsection (a) must:
(1) identify each agency represented on the council
that is responsible for implementing each strategy; and
(2) include a time frame for the implementation of
each strategy.

Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 3.02, eff. Sept. 1,
2003.


§ 2308.1016. DUTY TO FACILITATE DELIVERY OF INTEGRATED
ADULT EDUCATION AND LITERACY SERVICES. (a) In addition to any duty
imposed under this subchapter, to facilitate the efficient delivery
of integrated adult education and literacy services in this state,
the council shall:
(1) evaluate adult education and literacy programs
administered by the Texas Education Agency and the Texas Workforce
Commission to identify:
(A) any duplication of planning by those agencies
at the state and local level;
(B) any lack of adequate client information
sharing between those agencies; and
(C) any other problems that adversely affect the
delivery of those programs by the agencies;
(2) develop and implement immediate and long-range
strategies to address problems identified by the council under
Subdivision (1); and
(3) develop a system to monitor and evaluate the wage
and employment outcomes of students who participate in the adult
education and literacy programs administered by the Texas Education
Agency, including students referred to the programs by the Texas
Workforce Commission or local workforce development boards, to
ensure the effectiveness of the programs in improving the
employment-related outcomes of the students.
(b) The council shall include in the council's annual report
to the governor and to the legislature:
(1) a list of specific problems identified by the
council under Subsection (a) to be addressed by the council in the
following year; and
(2) the results of any measures taken by the council to
address problems identified by the council under Subsection (a).
(c) The long-range strategies developed by the council
under Subsection (a) must:
(1) identify the agency responsible for implementing
each strategy; and
(2) include a schedule for the implementation of each
strategy.

Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 817, § 5.04, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.




§ 2308.102. ASSUMPTION OF DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

Text of section as amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 110, § 2
(a) The council shall assume the duty to:
(1) develop, with the assistance of each appropriate
state agency, recommend to the governor, and report to the
legislature state plans required by applicable federal law in order
for the state to receive federal funds;
(2) make policy recommendations to the governor and
the legislature on goals and priorities for formula and
discretionary funds for all applicable programs;
(3) participate directly in the development of the
state plan for career and technology education, as required by law,
and recommend the plan to the Texas Education Agency;
(4) ensure that general revenue funds previously
available to the Texas Literacy Council are used to support the
efforts of local literacy councils in a manner consistent with the
state strategic plan;
(5) recommend to the State Board for Career and
Technology Education the division of federal funds between
secondary and postsecondary educational agencies under the Carl D.
Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act (20 U.S.C.
Section 2301 et seq.); and
(6) make recommendations to the Texas Workforce
Commission on unemployment insurance issues pertinent to the
responsibilities of the council.
(b) The council shall assume the responsibilities assigned
to the state advisory council under the following federal laws:
(1) the Job Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C.
Section 1501 et seq.);
(2) the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied
Technology Education Act (20 U.S.C. Section 2301 et seq.);
(3) the Adult Education Act (20 U.S.C. Section 1201 et
seq.);
(4) the Wagner-Peyser Act (29 U.S.C. Section 49 et
seq.);
(5) Part F, Subchapter IV, Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. Section 681 et seq.);
(6) the employment program established under Section
6(d)(4), Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. Section 2015(d)(4)); and
(7) the National Literacy Act of 1991 (20 U.S.C.
Section 1201 et seq.).
(c) The council shall assume the responsibilities formerly
exercised by the following state advisory councils and committees:
(1) the State Job Training Coordinating Council;
(2) the Texas Council on Vocational Education;
(3) the Texas Literacy Council; and
(4) the Apprenticeship and Training Advisory
Committee.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.08(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 6, eff. Sept. 1,
1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1420, § 9.014(a), eff. Sept. 1,
2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 110, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

For text of section as amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818,
§ 3.03, see § 2308.102, post.




§ 2308.102. ASSUMPTION OF DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

Text of section as amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, §
3.03
(a) The council shall assume the duty to:
(1) develop, with the assistance of each appropriate
state agency, recommend to the governor, and report to the
legislature state plans required by applicable federal law in order
for the state to receive federal funds;
(2) make policy recommendations to the governor and
the legislature on goals and priorities for formula and
discretionary funds for all applicable programs; and
(3) make recommendations to the Texas Workforce Commission
on unemployment insurance issues pertinent to the responsibilities
of the council.
(b) The council shall assume the responsibilities formerly
exercised by the Apprenticeship and Training Advisory Committee.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.08(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 6, eff. Sept. 1,
1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1420, § 9.014(a), eff. Sept. 1,
2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 3.03, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

For text of section as amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 110,
§ 2, see § 2308.102, ante.


§ 2308.103. ADDITIONAL POWERS AND LIMITATIONS. (a) The
council may:
(1) adopt rules essential to the internal functions
and duties of the council;
(2) make expenditures, enter into contracts with
public, private, and nonprofit organizations or agencies, require
reports to be made, conduct investigations, and take other actions
necessary or suitable to fulfill the council's duties under this
chapter;
(3) delegate to the executive director any power or
duty imposed on the council by law, including the authority to make
a final order or decision;
(4) provide for the mediation or arbitration of
disputes between agencies that perform functions for state and
federal programs as provided by this chapter;
(5) accept gifts, grants, and donations of money,
goods, or services to be used only to accomplish the council's
duties under this chapter; and
(6) share employees with another state agency.
(b) The council may not:
(1) adopt rules related to the operation of workforce
development; or
(2) delegate to the executive director the authority
to adopt rules.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.104. STRATEGIC PLAN. (a) The council shall
develop and recommend to the governor and report to the legislature
a single strategic plan that establishes the framework for the
budgeting and operation of the workforce development system,
including school to careers and welfare to work components,
administered by agencies represented on the council. The council
shall annually report to the governor and the legislature on the
implementation of the strategic plan.
(b) The council shall engage in strategic planning by
selecting or developing two types of performance measures as
described by Subsections (c) and (d). To the fullest extent
possible, all measures must be selected from those already
developed and approved before September 1, 2001, by one or more
state agencies that administer workforce programs. The council may
develop a new measure only if the council:
(1) identifies a gap in accountability; or
(2) determines that at least one state agency
administering a workforce program cannot report under the measures
developed and approved before September 1, 2001.
(c) The first type of performance measure consists of formal
measures identifying outcomes that are essentially consistent
across all workforce programs. Job placement rates, job retention
rates, and wage rates may be included among those measures. The
council may develop or select not more than five formal measures.
The council shall develop or select each formal measure in
consultation with the state agencies required to report under this
subsection. Once approved by the governor and the Legislative
Budget Board, a formal measure becomes part of the state's
performance budget and accounting system and applies to each state
agency that administers a workforce program.
(d) The second type of performance measure consists of less
formal measures to provide information determined by the council to
be essential in development of the strategic plan under this
section. Employer participation rates, customer satisfaction
levels, and educational attainment may be included among those
measures. The council shall develop or select each less formal
measure with the approval of the governor and in consultation with
the state agencies required to report under this subsection. The
Legislative Budget Board shall provide technical assistance to the
council to ensure that the measures and associated reporting
criteria are consistent with the state's performance budget and
accounting system. The council may exempt a state agency that
administers a workforce program from any requirement to use a less
formal measure.
(e) In addition to the other requirements of this chapter,
the strategic plan recommended by the council must recognize and
address literacy and basic education as activities that are
critical to the well-being of individuals and the state without
regard to whether the training and education is directed at
preparing an individual for employment.
(f) The council shall include in the strategic plan goals,
objectives, and performance measures for the workforce development
system that involve programs of all state agencies that administer
workforce programs.
(g) On approval of the plan by the governor, an agency
administering a workforce program shall use the strategic plan to
develop the agency's operational plan.
(h) The council shall include in the strategic plan
long-range strategies developed by the council under Section
2308.1015 to facilitate the seamless delivery of integrated
workforce services in this state.
(i) The council shall include in the strategic plan the
long-range strategies developed by the council under Section
2308.1016 to facilitate the efficient delivery of integrated adult
education and literacy services in this state.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.07(b), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 7, eff. Sept. 1,
1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 704, § 3, eff. Sept. 1, 2001;
Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 817, § 5.05, eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts
2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 3.04, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


§ 2308.105. LOCAL SERVICE INTEGRATION. The governor,
with the council and the local workforce development boards, shall:
(1) identify specific barriers to integrated service
delivery at the local level;
(2) request waivers from federal and state
regulations; and
(3) advocate changes in federal and state laws to
promote local service integration.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.106. DIVISION ASSISTANCE. The division shall
assist a local workforce development board in designing effective
measures to accomplish the board's responsibilities under Section
2308.302.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.09(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.107. COMPLAINTS AGAINST COUNCIL. (a) The council
shall maintain a file on each written complaint filed with the
council. The file must include:
(1) the name of the person who filed the complaint;
(2) the date the complaint is received by the council;
(3) the subject matter of the complaint;
(4) the name of each person contacted in relation to
the complaint;
(5) a summary of the results of the review or
investigation of the complaint; and
(6) an explanation of the reason the file was closed,
if the council closed the file without taking action other than to
investigate the complaint.
(b) The council shall provide to the person filing the
complaint and to each person who is a subject of the complaint a
copy of the council's policies and procedures relating to complaint
investigation and resolution.
(c) The council, at least quarterly until final disposition
of the complaint, shall notify the person filing the complaint and
each person who is a subject of the complaint of the status of the
investigation unless the notice would jeopardize an undercover
investigation.

Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 3.05, eff. Sept. 1,
2003.


§ 2308.108. POLICY ON TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS. The
members of the council shall develop and implement a policy
requiring the executive director and council employees to research
and propose appropriate technological solutions to improve the
council's ability to perform its functions. The technological
solutions must:
(1) ensure that:
(A) the public is able to easily find information
about the council on the Internet; and
(B) persons who want to use the council's
services are able to:
(i) interact with the council through the
Internet; and
(ii) access any service that can be
provided effectively through the Internet;
(2) be cost-effective; and
(3) be developed through the council's planning
processes.

Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 3.05, eff. Sept. 1,
2003.

SUBCHAPTER D. INFORMATION AND TRAINING


§ 2308.151. ESTABLISHMENT OF FUNDING FORMULA FOR
EVALUATION SYSTEM. The council shall establish, with the approval
of the governor, a funding formula to determine the level of support
each agency administering a workforce program must provide to
operate the automated follow-up and evaluation system administered
by the Texas Workforce Commission under Subchapter E, Chapter 302,
Labor Code.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 8, eff. Sept.
1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 704, § 4, eff. Sept. 1, 2001;
Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 4.01, 4.02, 5.01, eff. Sept. 1,
2003.


§ 2308.158. COUNCIL TRAINING; STANDARDS OF CONDUCT
INFORMATION. (a) A person who is appointed to and qualifies for
office as a council member may not vote, deliberate, or be counted
as a member in attendance at a meeting of the council until the
person completes a training program that complies with this
section.
(b) The training program must provide the person with
information regarding:
(1) the legislation that created the council;
(2) the programs operated by the council;
(3) the role and functions of the council;
(4) the rules of the council, with an emphasis on the
rules that relate to disciplinary and investigatory authority;
(5) the current budget for the council;
(6) the results of the most recent formal audit of the
council;
(7) the requirements of:
(A) the open meetings law, Chapter 551;
(B) the public information law, Chapter 552;
(C) the administrative procedure law, Chapter
2001; and
(D) other laws relating to public officials,
including conflict-of-interest laws; and
(8) any applicable ethics policies adopted by the
council or the Texas Ethics Commission.
(c) Each council member shall comply with the member
training requirements established by any other state agency that is
given authority to establish the requirements for the council.
(d) The executive director shall provide to the council's
members and employees, as often as necessary, information regarding
the requirements for office or employment under this chapter,
including information regarding a person's responsibilities under
applicable laws relating to standards of conduct for state officers
and employees.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 2.05, eff.
Sept. 1, 2003.


§ 2308.159. STATE EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE PROGRAM INFORMATION
AND TRAINING. The executive director or the executive director's
designee shall provide to council employees information and
training on the benefits and methods of participation in the state
employee incentive program.

Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 818, § 3.06, eff. Sept. 1,
2003.

SUBCHAPTER E. COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION BY STATE
AGENCIES


§ 2308.201. DEVELOPMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS. The council
shall develop recommendations periodically in each of the council's
areas of responsibility and shall submit the recommendations to the
governor.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.202. CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE
GOVERNOR. (a) The governor shall consider the recommendations
submitted under this subchapter.
(b) The governor shall approve, disapprove, or modify the
recommendations.
(c) The governor shall:
(1) return the recommendations to the council to be
forwarded as appropriate; or
(2) forward an approved or modified recommendation
without returning the recommendation to the council.
(d) A recommendation that is not approved, disapproved, or
modified by the governor before the 60th day after the date the
recommendation is submitted shall be considered approved by the
governor.
(e) A recommendation that is approved or modified shall be
forwarded to the appropriate agency for implementation.
(f) A recommendation that is approved or modified and that
requires a change in state or federal law shall be forwarded to the
appropriate legislative body for its consideration.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.203. ACTION BY STATE AGENCIES. (a) A state agency
that is responsible for the administration of human resources or
workforce development in this state shall implement a
recommendation under this subchapter if the recommendation does not
violate a federal or state law.
(b) A state agency shall:
(1) provide requested information to the council in a
timely manner;
(2) report on the implementation of the council's
recommendations at the time and in the format requested by the
council; and
(3) notify the governor, the executive director, and
the presiding officer of the council within 30 days if the agency
determines that a recommendation cannot be implemented.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.11(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 12, eff. Sept.
1, 1999.


§ 2308.205. FUND AVAILABILITY AND SERVICES. A state
agency represented on the council shall provide to the council and
each local workforce development board an estimate of fund
availability and services provided by the state agency in each
local workforce development area.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.206. PROVISION OF SERVICES BY STATE AGENCIES. A
state agency represented on the council shall, consistent with
state and federal law, provide workforce training and services in
accordance with the local workforce development plan developed by
the local workforce development board and approved by the governor
and shall implement rules and policies consistent with the plan.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.

SUBCHAPTER F. CREATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF LOCAL WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT AREAS AND LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARDS


§ 2308.251. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:
(1) "Board" means a local workforce development board.
(2) "Veteran" means a person who:
(A) has served in:
(i) the army, navy, air force, coast guard,
or marine corps of the United States or the United States Public
Health Service under 42 U.S.C. Section 201 et seq., as amended;
(ii) the state military forces as defined
by Section 431.001; or
(iii) an auxiliary service of one of those
branches of the armed forces; and
(B) has been honorably discharged from the branch
of the service in which the person served.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1426, § 1, eff. Sept.
1, 2001.


§ 2308.2515. APPLICATION OF PRIOR LAW. (a) If a change in
law made by House Bill 3480, Acts of the 76th Legislature, Regular
Session, 1999, would have the effect of invalidating an exemption
granted under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (Pub. L. No.
105-220), a local workforce development board may not operate under
that change in law but, instead, shall operate under the law as it
existed before the effective date of this Act.
(b) A change in law described by Subsection (a) of this
section does not affect other related provisions or applications of
a statute that can be given effect without that change in law, and
to this end those other provisions and applications of the statute
shall be given effect.

Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1103, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.


§ 2308.252. DESIGNATION OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
AREAS. (a) The governor shall, after receiving the
recommendations of the council, publish a proposed designation of
local workforce development areas for the planning and delivery of
workforce development.
(b) A local workforce development area:
(1) is composed of more than one contiguous unit of
general local government that includes at least one county;
(2) is consistent with either a local labor market
area, a metropolitan statistical area, one of the 24 substate
planning areas, or one of the 10 uniform state service regions; and
(3) is of a size sufficient to have the administrative
resources necessary to provide for the effective planning,
management, and delivery of workforce development.
(c) Units of general local government, business and labor
organizations, and other affected persons and organizations must be
given an opportunity to comment on and request revisions to the
proposed designation of a workforce development area.
(d) After considering all comments and requests for
changes, the governor shall make the final designation of workforce
development areas.
(e) The governor may redesignate workforce development
areas not more than once every two years. A redesignation must be
made not later than four months before the beginning of a program
year.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.253. CREATION OF LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
BOARDS. (a) The chief elected officials in a workforce development
area may form, in accordance with rules established by the Texas
Workforce Commission, a local workforce development board to:
(1) plan and oversee the delivery of workforce
training and services; and
(2) evaluate workforce development in the workforce
development area.
(b) The authority granted under Subsection (a) does not give
a local workforce development board any direct authority or control
over workforce funds and programs in its workforce development
area, other than programs funded through that board.
(c) Before a local workforce development board may be
created, at least three-fourths of the chief elected officials in
the workforce development area who represent units of general local
government must agree to the creation of the board, including all of
the chief elected officials who represent units of general local
government that have populations of at least 200,000. The elected
officials who agree to the creation of the board must represent at
least 75 percent of the population of the workforce development
area.
(d) The chief elected officials shall consider the views of
all affected local organizations, including private industry
councils and quality workforce planning committees, before making a
final decision on the formation of a board.
(e) An agreement on the formation of a board must be in
writing and must include:
(1) the purpose for the agreement;
(2) the process to be used to select the chief elected
official who will act on behalf of the other chief elected
officials;
(3) the process to be used to keep the chief elected
officials informed regarding local workforce development
activities;
(4) the initial size of the board;
(5) how resources allocated to the local workforce
development area are to be shared among the parties to the
agreement;
(6) the process, consistent with applicable federal
and state law, for the appointment of the board members; and
(7) the terms of office of the board members.
(f) In a state planning area in which there is more than one
local workforce development area, the quality workforce planning
committee of that state planning area shall continue in existence
to provide labor market information for the entire state planning
area until local workforce development boards are certified in each
workforce development area in that state planning area.
(g) The chief elected officials designated under Subsection
(c) shall enter into a partnership agreement with the board to:
(1) select the grant recipient and the administrative
entity for the local workforce development area; and
(2) determine procedures for the development of the
local workforce development plan.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.09(b),
19.12(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.254. LIMITATION ON EXERCISE OF BOARD POWERS. (a)
A power or duty granted a board under this chapter may not be
exercised in a workforce development area until:
(1) the chief elected officials in that area agree on
the establishment of a board as provided by Section 2308.253(c);
and
(2) the board is certified by the governor.
(b) A private industry council in an area in which a board is
not created or in which the chief elective officers are unable to
agree on the establishment of a board may not exercise any of the
powers granted a board by this chapter, except for a power granted
under the federal Job Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. Section
1501 et seq.).

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.12(b), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.255. APPOINTMENT OF BOARD; LIABILITY OF BOARD
MEMBERS. (a) The chief elected officials shall appoint the board.
(b) The appointments must:
(1) be consistent with the local government agreement
and applicable federal and state law; and
(2) reflect the ethnic and geographic diversity of the
workforce development area.
(c) To provide continuity, the chief elected officials
shall consider appointing persons to the local workforce
development board who are serving or who have served previously on a
private industry council, a quality workforce planning committee, a
job service employer committee, and any other entity affected by
this chapter.
(d) Board members serve fixed and staggered terms as
provided by the local government agreement or applicable federal or
state law and may continue to serve until successors are appointed.
(e) A member or former member of a board may not be held
personally liable for a claim, damage, loss, or repayment
obligation of federal or state funds that arises under this chapter
unless the act or omission that causes the claim, damage, loss, or
repayment obligation constitutes, on the part of the board member
or former board member:
(1) official misconduct;
(2) wilful disregard of the requirements of this
chapter; or
(3) gross negligence.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.12(c), (d)
eff. Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.256. BOARD MEMBERSHIP. (a) A board is composed as
follows:
(1) representatives of the private sector, who:
(A) constitute a majority of the membership of
the board; and
(B) are owners of business concerns, chief
executives or chief operating officers of nongovernmental
employers, or other private sector executives who have substantial
management or policy responsibilities;
(2) representatives of organized labor and
community-based organizations, who constitute not less than 15
percent of the membership of the board; and
(3) representatives of each of the following:
(A) educational agencies, including community
colleges and secondary and postsecondary practitioners
representing vocational education, that are representative of all
educational agencies in the service delivery area;
(B) vocational rehabilitation agencies;
(C) public assistance agencies;
(D) economic development agencies;
(E) the public employment service;
(F) local literacy councils; and
(G) adult basic and continuing education
organizations.
(b) Private sector representatives on the board are
selected from individuals nominated by general-purpose business
organizations that have consulted with and received
recommendations from other business organizations in the workforce
development area. The nominations and the individuals selected from
the nominations must reasonably represent the industrial and
demographic composition of the business community. Not less than
one-half of the business and industry representatives must be, if
possible, representatives of small businesses, including minority
businesses.
(c) The education representatives on the board are selected
from individuals nominated by regional or local educational
agencies, vocational education institutions, institutions of
higher education, including entities offering adult education, and
general organizations of the institutions within the workforce
development area.
(d) The labor representatives on the board are selected from
individuals recommended by recognized state and local labor
federations. If a state or local labor federation does not nominate
a number of individuals sufficient to meet the labor representation
requirements of Subsection (a)(2), individual workers may be
included on the council to complete the labor representation.
(e) The remaining members of the board are selected from
individuals recommended by interested organizations.
(f) In this section:
(1) "General-purpose business organization" means an
organization that admits for membership any for-profit business
operating within the workforce development area.
(2) "Small business" means a private, for-profit
enterprise that employs not more than 500 employees.
(g) At least one of the members of a board appointed under
Subsection (a) must, in addition to the qualifications required for
the member under that subsection, have expertise in child care or
early childhood education.
(h) At least one of the members of a board appointed under
Subsection (a) must be a veteran who:
(1) meets the qualifications required for the member
under that subsection; and
(2) serves as a representative on the board for the
interests of veterans in the workforce development area.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 340, § 1, eff. Sept.
1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1103, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999;
Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1426, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts
2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1142, § 1, eff. June 20, 2003; Acts 2005,
79th Leg., ch. 511, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2005.


§ 2308.257. RECUSAL. (a) A member of a board shall avoid
the appearance of conflict of interest by not voting in, or
participating in, any decision by the board regarding the provision
of services by such member, or any organization which that member
directly represents, or on any matter which would provide direct
financial benefit to that member, the member's immediate family, or
any organization which that member directly represents.
(b) Subsection (a) shall serve as a minimum standard and
shall not be construed as to limit the board's authority for more
restrictive governance to prevent real and/or apparent conflict of
interest.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1004, § 6, eff. Sept.
1, 2001.


§ 2308.258. PRESIDING OFFICER. The presiding officer of
a board is selected from the members of the board who represent the
private sector.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.259. BOARD COMMITTEES. A board may create
committees as needed to carry out its duties and responsibilities.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.260. TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPS. A board may
create technical advisory groups composed of both council and
noncouncil members to provide assistance to the board.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.261. CERTIFICATION OF BOARD. (a) The governor
shall certify a board on determining that the board's composition
is consistent with applicable federal and state law and
requirements and meets established state criteria.
(b) The governor shall certify or deny certification not
later than the 30th day after the date a certification request is
submitted to the governor.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.262. BUDGET. A board shall adopt a budget for the
board that must be included in the local workforce development plan
submitted to the division.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.13(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.263. APPROVAL OF FISCAL AGENT. (a) The Texas
Workforce Commission must approve the fiscal agent selected by a
board before any federal or state workforce development funds may
be disbursed to the board.
(b) The commission shall base its approval on an audit of
the financial capability of the fiscal agent to ensure that fiscal
controls and fund accounting procedures necessary to guarantee the
proper disbursal of and accounting for federal and state funds are
in place.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.14, eff.
Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.264. CONTRACTING FOR SERVICE DELIVERY. (a) Except
as otherwise provided by this section, a board may not directly
provide workforce training or one-stop workforce services.
(b) A board may request from the Texas Workforce Commission
a waiver of Subsection (a).
(c) The request for a waiver must include a detailed
justification based on the lack of an existing qualified
alternative for delivery of workforce training and services in the
workforce development area.
(d) If a board receives a waiver to provide workforce
training and one-stop workforce services, the evaluation of results
and outcomes is provided by the Texas Workforce Commission.
(e) In consultation with local workforce development
boards, the Texas Workforce Commission by rule shall establish
contracting guidelines for boards under this section, including
guidelines designed to:
(1) ensure that each independent contractor that
contracts to provide one-stop workforce services under this section
has sufficient insurance, bonding, and liability coverage for the
overall financial security of one-stop workforce services funds and
operations;
(2) prevent potential conflicts of interest between
boards and entities that contract with boards under this section;
(3) ensure that if a board acts as a fiscal agent for
an entity that contracts with the board to provide one-stop
workforce services, the board does not deliver the services or
determine eligibility for the services; and
(4) ensure that an entity that contracts with a board
under this section may use, display, and advertise the entity's
name when providing workforce services for the board.
(f) The Texas Workforce Commission shall ensure that each
board complies with this section and may approve a local plan under
Section 2308.304 only if the plan complies with this section.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 817, § 4.01, eff.
Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2005, 79th Leg., ch. 1350, § 1, eff. June 18,
2005.


§ 2308.265. INCENTIVES AND WAIVERS. (a) A board
certified by the governor is eligible for incentives and program
waivers to promote and support integrated planning and evaluation
of workforce development.
(b) To the extent feasible under federal and state workforce
development law, incentives include priority for discretionary
funding, including financial incentives for the consolidation of
service delivery areas authorized under the federal Job Training
Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. Section 1501 et seq.).

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.266. NONPROFIT STATUS; ABILITY TO SOLICIT
FUNDS. (a) A board may apply for and receive a charter as a
private, nonprofit corporation under the laws of this state and may
choose to be recognized as a Section 501(c)(3) organization under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. Section 501(c)(3)).
(b) In addition to receiving funds specified in this
chapter, a board may solicit additional funds from other public and
private sources.
(c) A board may not solicit or accept money from an entity
with which the board contracts for the delivery of services.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.267. STAFF. (a) A board may employ professional,
technical, and support staff to carry out its planning, oversight,
and evaluation functions.
(b) A board's staff shall be separate from and independent
of any organization providing workforce education or workforce
training and services in the workforce development area. A board's
staff may not direct or control the staffing of any entity providing
one-stop workforce services.
(c) The requirement for separate staffing does not preclude
a board from designating a qualified organization to provide staff
services to the board if the board:
(1) arranges for independent evaluation of any other
workforce services provided by the staffing organization; and
(2) requests and obtains from the Texas Workforce
Commission a waiver of the separate staffing requirement and of the
requirement under Section 2308.264(a).
(d) A request for a waiver under Subsection (c)(2) must
contain a detailed justification for the waiver, including:
(1) cost-effectiveness;
(2) prior experience;
(3) geographic or budgetary considerations; and
(4) availability of qualified applicants.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.13(b), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 817, § 4.02, eff. Sept.
1, 2003.


§ 2308.268. ASSISTANCE AND SANCTIONS FOR
NONPERFORMANCE. (a) The council shall provide technical
assistance to local workforce development areas that do not meet
performance standards established under this chapter and other
applicable federal and state law.
(b) If a local workforce development area does not meet
performance standards for two consecutive program years, the
council shall develop and impose a reorganization plan that may
include:
(1) restructuring the board;
(2) prohibiting the use of designated service
providers, including state agencies; and
(3) merging the local workforce development area with
another area.
(c) If nonperformance is directly attributable to a
specific state agency, the council may select an alternative
provider.
(d) A local workforce development area that is the subject
of a reorganization plan may appeal to the governor to rescind or
revise the plan not later than the 30th day after the date of
receiving notice of the plan.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.269. SANCTIONS FOR LACK OF FISCAL
ACCOUNTABILITY. If, as a result of financial and compliance audits
or for another reason, the Texas Workforce Commission finds a
substantial violation of a specific provision of this chapter or
another federal or state law or regulation and corrective action
has not been taken, the council shall:
(1) issue a notice of intent to revoke all or part of
the affected local plan;
(2) issue a notice of intent to cease immediately
reimbursement of local program costs; or
(3) impose a reorganization plan under Section
2308.268 for the local workforce development area.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.15, eff.
Sept. 1, 1997.

SUBCHAPTER G. RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES OF LOCAL WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT BOARDS


§ 2308.301. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:
(1) "Board" means a local workforce development board.
(2) "Commission" means the Texas Workforce
Commission.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1420, § 9.016(a),
eff. Sept. 1, 2001.


§ 2308.302. RESPONSIBILITY OF BOARD. (a) A board is
directly responsible and accountable to the division for the
planning and oversight of all workforce training and services and
the evaluation of all workforce development programs in the
workforce development area. A board shall ensure effective
outcomes consistent with statewide goals, objectives, and
performance standards approved by the governor.
(b) A board is directly responsible to the division for the
operational planning and administration of all workforce training
and services funded through the Texas Workforce Commission to the
local area.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.09(c), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.303. BOARD DUTIES. (a) A board shall:
(1) serve as a single point of contact for local
businesses to communicate their skill needs and to influence the
direction of all workforce development programs in the workforce
development area;
(2) serve as a private industry council under the Job
Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. Section 1501 et seq.);
(3) develop a local plan to address the workforce
development needs of the workforce development area that:
(A) is responsive to the goals, objectives, and
performance standards established by the governor;
(B) targets services to meet local needs,
including the identification of industries and employers likely to
employ workers who complete job training programs; and
(C) ensures that the workforce development
system, including the educational system, has the flexibility to
meet the needs of local businesses;
(4) designate the board or another entity as the
board's fiscal agent to be responsible and accountable for the
management of all workforce development funds available to the
board;
(5) create local career development centers under
Section 2308.312;
(6) review plans for workforce education to ensure
that the plans address the needs of local businesses and recommend
appropriate changes in the delivery of education services;
(7) assume the functions and responsibilities of local
workforce development advisory boards, councils, and committees
authorized by federal or state law, including private industry
councils, quality workforce planning committees, job service
employer committees, and local general vocational program advisory
committees;
(8) monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the
career development centers, state agencies and other contractors
providing workforce training and services, and vocational and
technical education programs operated by local education agencies
and institutions of higher education to ensure that performance is
consistent with state and local goals and objectives; and
(9) promote cooperation and coordination among public
organizations, community organizations, charitable organizations,
religious organizations, and private businesses providing
workforce development, in a manner consistent with the
nondiscrimination principles and safeguards stated in 42 U.S.C.
Section 604a.
(b) The board shall ensure that employment services are
provided for persons seeking employment in the local workforce
development area. The board shall contract with an appropriate
entity for the provision of services, or, if all necessary waivers
are granted, the board may provide the services directly.
(c) In performing its duties under this section, a board may
provide to the division relevant labor market information and
information regarding the availability of existing workforce
development.
(d) A provider must respond to a change recommended by a
board under Subsection (a)(6) not later than the 30th day after the
date the provider receives the recommendation.
(e) A board shall educate the public about the plumbing
profession and the resources available to employers for the
recruitment and training of plumbers as provided by Section
1301.652, Occupations Code.
(f) These educational efforts may be conducted to the extent
that the plumbing profession is designated as an occupation in
demand by a board.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.09(d), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 401, § 2, eff. Aug. 30,
1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 13, eff. Sept. 1, 1999;
Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 819, § 28, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


§ 2308.3035. COMPONENTS OF LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
SYSTEM. The local workforce development system is composed of two
major components as follows:
(1) an employer services component that provides labor
market information and services and other services as appropriate
to local employers; and
(2) an integrated service delivery system composed of
a network of career development centers that serve the people of
this state based on a "one-stop for service" approach and supported
by electronic access to comprehensive labor market information.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.18(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1997.


§ 2308.304. LOCAL PLAN. (a) A board shall adopt a single
plan that includes the components specified in this section.
(b) The plan must include a strategic component that:
(1) assesses the labor market needs of the local
workforce development area;
(2) identifies existing workforce development
programs;
(3) evaluates the effectiveness of existing programs
and services; and
(4) sets broad goals and objectives for all workforce
development programs in the local area consistent with statewide
goals, objectives, and performance standards.
(c) The plan must include an operational component that
specifies how all of the resources available to the local workforce
development area from the Texas Workforce Commission will be used
to achieve the goals and objectives of the plan for the area. At a
minimum, this component must establish:
(1) the goals, objectives, and performance measures to
be used in overseeing and evaluating the operation of all workforce
training and services;
(2) the segments of the population targeted for
various services;
(3) the mix of services to be provided and how those
services are to be provided; and
(4) the structure of the local service delivery
system.
(d) Program resources included in the operational component
are:
(1) job training programs funded under the Job
Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. Section 1501 et seq.);
(2) postsecondary vocational and technical job
training programs that are not part of approved courses or programs
that lead to licensing, certification, or an associate degree under
Chapters 61, 130, and 135, or Subchapter E, Chapter 88, Education
Code;
(3) adult education programs under Subchapter H,
Chapter 29, Education Code;
(4) employment services programs;
(5) literacy funds available to the state under the
National Literacy Act of 1991 (20 U.S.C. Section 1201 et seq.);
(6) the job opportunities and basic skills program
under Part F, Subchapter IV, Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. Section
682); and
(7) the food stamp employment and training program
authorized under 7 U.S.C. Section 2015(d).

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.16(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.305. USE OF LABOR MARKET INFORMATION SYSTEM. A
board shall review, verify, modify, and use local labor market
information developed through the state's labor market information
system to identify, by occupation, the labor demand by employers in
each workforce development area.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.17(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.306. REPORT. A board shall periodically provide a
report summarizing by occupation the labor demand to:
(1) each public postsecondary institution providing
vocational and technical education; and
(2) each entity under contract to the board to provide
workforce training and services in a workforce development area.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.307. FILLING EDUCATIONAL NEEDS. (a) If a need in
the availability of workforce education is indicated by the labor
market information system provided by the board, by a direct
request of employers located in the workforce area, or as the result
of economic development incentives designed to attract or retain an
employer, an institution may apply to the Texas Higher Education
Coordinating Board for approval to offer the needed workforce
education.
(b) An institution that desires to provide the needed
workforce education must apply to the coordinating board not later
than the 30th day after the date the need is identified.
(c) The coordinating board shall give immediate priority to
the institution's application and shall notify the institution of
the board's approval or disapproval not later than the 100th day
after the date the application is received.
(d) If more than one institution in a workforce development
area applies to provide the needed workforce education, the
coordinating board shall select one or more institutions to offer
the needed education as provided by Section 61.051, Education Code.
(e) If an institution approved by the coordinating board
does not offer the approved workforce education in a timely manner,
a board may solicit another qualified provider to apply to the
coordinating board to provide needed education to be funded through
state-appropriated formula funds.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.308. PUBLIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE. A public community
college shall promptly provide workforce training and services that
are requested:
(1) by a board if the need for the training and
services is based on the labor market information system available
for the area;
(2) by employers located in the college's taxing
district when the request is presented directly to the college by
the employers or through the board; or
(3) as part of economic development incentives
designed to attract or retain an employer, including incentives
offered under the skills development fund program under Chapter
303, Labor Code.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.17(b), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 2005, 79th Leg., ch. 1115, § 7, eff. June 18,
2005.


§ 2308.309. INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION. (a) An
institution of higher education that has local taxing authority and
is governed by a locally elected board of trustees is the primary
provider of local workforce training and services that are needed
by an employer within the taxing district and funded fully or in
part by local funds, except in Cameron, McLennan, and Potter
counties, or by technical vocational funds administered by the
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
(b) A board shall select another qualified local or
statewide provider if the local institution does not promptly
provide locally needed workforce training and services.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.310. CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES NOT
PROHIBITED. This subchapter does not prohibit an institution of
higher education from offering workforce education or workforce
training and services that:
(1) are needed by an employer located in the
institution's taxing district and that meet all applicable
standards; or
(2) have been approved under applicable law and that
are reviewed by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.311. LIST OF PUBLICLY FUNDED PROGRAMS AND
CLASSES. (a) Each local education agency and public or private
postsecondary educational institution shall provide the board in
its area a list of all vocational-technical programs and classes
the agency or institution offers that are funded by state or federal
funds.
(b) A board, with the assistance of the labor demand
occupation report, shall evaluate the supply of
vocational-technical programs in relation to the demand for the
programs and report any discrepancies between supply and demand to
the appropriate educational institution, the Central Education
Agency, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, the council,
and the Legislative Budget Board.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995.


§ 2308.312. CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTERS. (a) A board
shall establish career development centers accessible to students,
workers, and persons formerly sentenced to the institutional
division or state jail division of the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice throughout the workforce development area. The board shall
establish the centers not later than the 180th day after the date
the board is certified.
(b) Each center shall provide access to information and
services available in the workforce development area, including
employment services, and shall address the individual needs of
students, workers, and persons formerly sentenced to the
institutional division or state jail division.
(c) The services must include:
(1) labor market information, including:
(A) available job openings; and
(B) education and training opportunities in the
local area, in the state, and, as feasible, in the nation;
(2) uniform eligibility requirements and application
procedures for all workforce training and services;
(3) independent assessment of individual needs and the
development of an individual service strategy;
(4) centralized and continuous case management and
counseling;
(5) individual referral for services, including basic
education, classroom skills training, on-the-job training, and
customized training;
(6) support services, including child care
assistance, student loans, and other forms of financial assistance
required to participate in and complete training; and
(7) job training and employment assistance for persons
formerly sentenced to the institutional division or state jail
division, provided in cooperation with Project RIO.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.18(b), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, § 8.23(a), eff.
Sept. 1, 1999.


§ 2308.3121. SERVICE PROVIDER LIMITATION; WAIVER. (a)
Except as provided by Subsection (b), a person who provides
one-stop services may not also provide developmental services such
as basic education and skills training.
(b) The division may develop a waiver process for a person
subject to Subsection (a). A request for a waiver must include a
detailed justification based on the lack of an existing qualified
alternative for delivery of developmental services in the
applicable workforce development area.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.18(c), eff. Sept. 1,
1997.


§ 2308.3122. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE CLAIMS. In
cooperation with the boards, the Texas Workforce Commission shall
provide for the filing of unemployment insurance claims through
career development centers in each local workforce development
area.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.18(c), eff. Sept. 1,
1997.


§ 2308.313. RIGHT TO KNOW. A career development center
shall provide to each person, before the person participates in a
vocational or technical training program, a document that informs
the person of:
(1) current employment prospects;
(2) the current wage level for a person who completes
the vocational or technical training program in which the person is
considering participating; and
(3) the most recent information available on the
performance of institutions that provide that training in the local
workforce development area.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, § 5.81(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.18(d), eff.
Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.314. TAX ASSISTANCE. (a) The Texas Workforce
Commission may provide to individuals who participate in a
workforce development program information on the federal earned
income tax credit for working families. The commission may assist
participants in preparing and filing federal income tax forms to
ensure that a participant who is eligible to receive the tax credit
obtains the tax credit. The commission may fulfill its duties under
this subsection by:
(1) working in conjunction with the Internal Revenue
Service to make each workforce development center a volunteer
income tax assistance site during the two months preceding the date
federal income taxes are due; or
(2) using specially trained staff or volunteers to
assist in preparing and filing federal income tax forms.
(b) The Texas Workforce Commission may provide information
on the federal earned income tax credit to an employer who hires a
welfare recipient under a wage supplementation program.
(c) In addition to providing information under Subsection
(a) to an individual who participates in a workforce development
program, the Texas Workforce Commission may provide the information
to any other person who uses services provided through a workforce
development center.
(d) In this section:
(1) "Wage supplementation program" means a program
under which the state reserves all or part of the amounts that would
be payable as benefits to welfare recipients and uses those amounts
to provide and subsidize jobs for the recipients.
(2) "Welfare recipient" means a person who receives
financial assistance under Chapter 31, Human Resources Code, or
food stamps under the food stamp program administered under Chapter
33, Human Resources Code.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1321, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.


§ 2308.315. REIMBURSEMENT RATES FOR CHILD CARE. Each
board shall establish graduated reimbursement rates for child care
based on the Texas Workforce Commission's designated vendor
program. The minimum reimbursement rate for designated vendors
must be at least five percent greater than the maximum rate
established for nondesignated vendors for the same category of
care. The designated vendor rate differential established in this
section shall be funded with federal child care development funds
dedicated to quality improvement activities.

Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1576, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.


§ 2308.316. FUNDING OF COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT PROCESS
FOR INFANT AND EARLY CHILDHOOD CHILD CARE. Each board shall
allocate a portion of the board's federal child care development
funds dedicated to quality improvement activities to a competitive
procurement process for a system for quality child care for
children under four years of age that encourages child care
providers to voluntarily meet the criteria of the Texas Workforce
Commission's designated vendor program or national accreditation.
In allocating funds under this section, special consideration shall
be given to funding child care for children under four years of age
in low-income communities. This section may not be interpreted to
limit parental choice.

Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1576, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.


§ 2308.3165. SCOPE OF CHILD CARE SERVICES. In addition
to other programs approved by a board or permitted by another law, a
child who is otherwise eligible for child care services funded by a
board is eligible to receive the services while the child is
enrolled in a federal Head Start program or in after-school care
provided at a school.

Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1142, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.


§ 2308.317. EXPENDITURES FOR CERTAIN CHILD CARE QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, the
Texas Workforce Commission shall ensure that, to the extent federal
child care development funds dedicated to quality improvement
activities are used to improve quality and availability of child
care, those funds are used only for quality child care programs.
(b) For purposes of this section, a quality child care
program is a program that:
(1) promotes:
(A) the physical, social, emotional, and
intellectual development of young children;
(B) frequent, positive, warm interactions
appropriate to a child's age and development; and
(C) regular communication with parents who are
welcomed by the program at all times to participate in activities
and to observe, discuss, and recommend policies; and
(2) provides:
(A) a healthy, safe, and nurturing environment
for young children;
(B) planned learning activities appropriate to a
child's age and development;
(C) specially trained child care providers;
(D) a sufficient number of adults to respond to
the needs of each child;
(E) a variety of age-appropriate materials;
(F) nutritious meals and snacks;
(G) an effective program administration; and
(H) an ongoing, systematic evaluation process
for the program.

Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1517, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.


§ 2308.318. MATCHING FUNDS FOR CHILD CARE SERVICES. For
purposes of obtaining federal matching funds for child care
services, including after-school care provided at a school or a
federal Head Start program, a board shall use money and in-kind
services provided by a local school district or local education
agency for those services to the extent permitted by federal law.

Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 667, § 1, eff. June 13, 2001.
Renumbered from V.T.C.A., Government Code § 2308.317 by Acts
2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1275, § 2(89), eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


§ 2308.319. COLLABORATIVE READING INITIATIVES. The
commission shall encourage each local workforce development board
to raise an amount of local funds in excess of the amount required
to meet performance measures to be used to support collaborative
reading initiatives.

Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 817, § 4.03, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

SUBCHAPTER H. SKILL STANDARDS BOARD


§ 2308.401. TEXAS SKILL STANDARDS BOARD. (a) The Texas
Skill Standards Board is an advisory board to the governor and the
legislature on the development of a statewide system of
industry-defined and industry-recognized skill standards and
credentials for all major skilled occupations that:
(1) provide strong employment and earnings
opportunities in this state; and
(2) require less than a baccalaureate degree.
(b) The skill standards board is composed of 11 members
appointed by and serving at the pleasure of the governor. The skill
standards board consists of the following members:
(1) seven members who represent business, two of whom
must be from business entities that employ fewer than 50 employees;
(2) two members who represent labor;
(3) one member who represents secondary education;
and
(4) one member who represents postsecondary
education.
(c) The governor shall appoint the presiding officer of the
skill standards board from the members who represent business. The
skill standards board shall meet at the call of the presiding
officer as often as necessary to accomplish its duties.
(d) A member of the skill standards board is not entitled to
compensation for service on the board but is entitled to
reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred in performing
duties as a member of the board, subject to any applicable
limitation in the General Appropriations Act.
(e) Chapter 2110 does not apply to the skill standards
board.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.19(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1997.


§ 2308.402. DUTIES OF SKILL STANDARDS BOARD. (a) The
skill standards board shall:
(1) validate and recognize nationally established
skill standards to guide curriculum development, training,
assessment, and certification of workforce skills;
(2) convene industry groups to develop skill standards
and certification procedures for industries and occupations in
which standards have not been established or adopted and recognize
the skill standards and certification procedures;
(3) review the standards developed by other states and
foreign countries and enter into agreements for mutual recognition
of standards and credentials to enhance portability of skills; and
(4) promote the use of standards and credentials among
employers.
(b) The skill standards board shall:
(1) report periodically to the governor; and
(2) provide annual reports to the governor, the
division, and the legislature.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.19(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1997. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1472, § 14, eff.
Sept. 1, 1999.


§ 2308.403. STAFF SUPPORT. The council shall provide
staff support for the Texas Skill Standards Board as necessary.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, § 19.19(a), eff. Sept. 1,
1997.